Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know/Approved

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}


This page holds approved nominations that are waiting to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page. Following DYK approval, nominations are processed and moved into a Prep area, and from there, prep sets are promoted to a queue, and then to the main page.

To create a new nomination or to see those that are yet to be approved, see Template talk:Did you know. For the discussion page see WT:DYK. Click on the link to go directly to the Special occasion holding area.

  If some of the nominations are not showing up properly at the bottom of the page, these alternative pages can be used to view a subset of the most recent nominations.
Count of DYK Hooks
Section # of Hooks # Verified
April 19 1
May 2 1
May 10 1
May 12 3 1
May 14 2 1
May 16 2
May 17 4 1
May 20 5 2
May 21 3
May 22 4 1
May 24 4 2
May 25 2
May 26 3 2
May 27 2
May 28 1
May 29 2 1
May 30 3 1
May 31 1 1
June 1 2 2
June 2 5 1
June 3 3 1
June 4 1
June 5 6 4
June 6 3 2
June 7 4 2
June 8 7 3
June 9 12 6
June 10 4 2
June 11 5 2
June 12 7 2
June 13 13 6
June 14 7 2
June 15 6 4
June 16 8 4
June 17 9 4
June 18 8 2
June 19 4 2
June 20 5 2
June 21 9 3
June 22 11 2
June 23 13 3
June 24 9 1
June 25 13 3
June 26 8 2
June 27 6 1
June 28 6 1
June 29 1
Total 239 82
Last updated 10:41, 29 June 2024 UTC
Current time is 11:36, 29 June 2024 UTC [refresh]

Instructions for nominators[edit]

This page is for those nominations that have already been approved and are waiting to be promoted. If yours has been approved but has not yet been run on the main page, it should either be on this page or will soon be moved here, or already promoted to a Prep area or Queue ahead of an appearance on the main page.

If you wish to create a new nomination, please go to the Template talk:Did you know page; there are instructions there in a section similar to this one on how to nominate an article for DYK.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

Backlogged?[edit]

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until someone promotes it to a preparation area. To alleviate this problem, if the approved page has more than 120 approved hooks, then sets will change twice per day (every 12 hours) instead of once per day (every 24 hours). When the backlog falls below 60 approved nominations set frequency returns to once a day.

Where is my hook?[edit]

If you can't find the nomination you submitted to the nominations page, and it also isn't on this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is either in one of the prep areas, has been promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.

If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Instructions for other editors[edit]

How to promote an accepted hook[edit]

  • See Wikipedia:Did you know/Preparation areas for full instructions.
  • In one window, open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to promote.
  • In another window, open the prep set you intend to add the hook to.
  • In the prep set...
    • Paste the hook into the hook area (be sure to not paste in that that)
    • Paste the credit information ({{DYKmake}} and/or {{DYKnom}}) into the credits area.
    • Add an edit summary, e.g., "Promoted [[Jane Fonda]]", preview, and save
  • Back on DYK nomination page...
    • change {{DYKsubpage to {{subst:DYKsubpage
    • change |passed= to |passed=yes
    • Add an edit summary, e.g., "Promoted original hook to Prep 3", preview, and save

How to remove a hook from the prep areas or queue[edit]

  • Edit the prep area or queue where the hook is and remove the hook and the credits associated with it.
  • Go to the hook's nomination subpage (there should have been a link to it in the credits section).
    • View the edit history for that page
    • Go back to the last version before the edit where the hook was promoted, and revert to that version to make the nomination active again.
    • Add a new icon on the nomination subpage to cancel the previous tick and leave a comment after it explaining that the hook was removed from the prep area or queue, and why, so that later reviewers are aware of this issue.
  • Add a transclusion of the template back to the nominations page so that reviewers can see it. It goes under the date that it was first created/expanded/listed as a GA. You may need to add back the day header for that date if it had been removed from the nominations page.
  • If you removed the hook from a queue, it is best to either replace it with another hook from one of the prep areas, or to leave a message at WT:DYK asking someone else to do so.

Nominations[edit]

Special occasion holding area[edit]

Shortcut
Do not nominate articles in this section—nominate all articles in the nominations section on the regular nominations page, under the date on which the article was created or moved to mainspace, or the expansion began, or it was listed as a Good Article; be sure to indicate in the nomination any request for a specially timed appearance on the main page.
Note: Articles intended to be held for special occasion dates should be nominated within seven days of creation, start of expansion, or promotion to Good Article status. The nomination should be made between at least one week prior to the occasion date, to allow time for reviews and promotions through the prep and queue sets, but not more than six weeks in advance. The proposed occasion must be deemed sufficiently special by reviewers. The timeline limitations, including the six week maximum, may be waived by consensus, if a request is made at WT:DYK, but requests are not always successful. Discussion clarifying the hold criteria can be found here: [1]; discussion setting the six week limit can be found here: [2].
April Fools' Day hooks are exempted from the timeline limit; see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.
Note for promoters: please be sure to add an "invisible" comment after a hook when you've placed it in prep, noting that it's a special occasion hook and including the date it is supposed to run. This should keep the hook from being moved after promotion, as sometimes happens to hooks when a queue needs a slot filled or a prep set needs to be made more balanced by swapping hooks between preps.

No current non-Olympics requests[edit]

Summer Olympics, July 26 through August 11[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Olympic hooks table for potential timing changes.

July 23 (pre-Olympics hook)[edit]

Toby Olubi, Can't Touch This (game show)

( Comment or view )
( Article history links:
)
5x expanded by Launchballer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 231 past nominations.

Launchballer 13:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@48JCL: Which article are you referring to? This is a double nomination.--Launchballer 14:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Both. 48JCLTALK 15:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I personally like ALT1 or ALT0, but ALT1 my preference. 48JCLTALK 15:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


July 25[edit]

Solomon Islands at the 2020 Summer Olympics

(
)
5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Arconning (talk) 13:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

July 27[edit]

Fathimath Dheema Ali

(
)
Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 192 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: Created seven days before nom and prose is 2909 B. BeanieFan11, do the QPQ and fix the sourcing issue, and you're good to go. ミラP@Miraclepine 01:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please suggest that we run this hook on 27 July, which is when the single women's table tennis preliminary round starts? See Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Olympic hooks table for background. Schwede66 04:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


July 31[edit]

Dylan Travis

(
)
  • ... that in nine years, basketball player Dylan Travis played for nine head coaches?
  • Source: USA Basketball ("In nine years of playing basketball beyond the high school level, he played for nine different coaches.")
Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 191 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi BeanieFan11, review follows: article moved to mainspace on 11 June and exceeds minimum length; article is generally well written (I couldn't parse "was named first-team All-State, All-Metro and to the Lincoln Journal Star's Super-State Team" but might just be my ignorance of basketball?); sources cited look to be reliable enough, though I am not familiar with them; I didn't pick up any issues with overly close paraphrasing from a spot check; hook fact is interesting enough for me, mentioned in the article and checks out to the source cited. My first review for a good few months but looks fine to me except that a QPQ is awaited - Dumelow (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BeanieFan11: Following up on the QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dumelow: QPQ done; sorry for the delay. (Also, in the sentence you mention, those things mentioned are different all-star teams.) BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


August 9[edit]

Manizha Talash

(
)
Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 193 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough and long enough. QPQ has since been supplied. All hook facts check out and are interesting in various ways, especially ALT0/ALT1. Dunno if we need quotes on the quote from the headline. No textual or other issues. Fine for the 9 August Olympic suggestion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Approved nominations[edit]

Articles created/expanded on May 12[edit]

Lillie Shockney

(
)
Lillie Shockney
Lillie Shockney
  • ... that Lillie Shockney is a co-founder of the Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators?
Moved to mainspace by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 81 past nominations.

Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 14[edit]

Saleh Manaf

(
)
Created by Jeromi Mikhael (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 64 past nominations.

Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 12:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

New reviewer required. Z1720 (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: As noted above, the lede should be beefed up before this hits the main page. Also, given the recent RFC, I'm not sure focusing on the negative aspects of this BLP (i.e., the goat head protest), is going to fly on the main page. It's a very interesting fact, and supported by Liputan6, but something else may work better in the current climate.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492: I've expanded the lede of the article, but I might need some help finding interesting part of the article other than the BLPed hook. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 12:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unpromoted per WT:DYK. New review needed for ALT2. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeromi Mikhael: Where is it in the article?--Launchballer 17:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: It was not mentioned explicitly previously, but there was a discussion regarding this in here. I've copyedited the article to make the fact in the hook more explicit. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 18:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is not what an underdog is (someone expected to lose), and in either case you'd need an end-of-sentence citation for it.--Launchballer 18:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Alright then, change of hook. ALT4: "... that the regent of Bekasi, Saleh Manaf, was protested by his own local environment service?" quote from: this one, ref no. 14 Beberapa waktu yang lalu, Dinas Kebersihan Kabupaten Bekasi sebenarnya sudah mengirimkan surat protes kepada Bupati Bekasi, meminta pertanggung-jawaban bupati terhadap dampak lingkungan dan akibat sampah yang dibuang truk pengangkut sampah. (Some time ago, the Bekasi Regency Environment Service actually sent a letter of protest to the Regent of Bekasi, asking the regent to be responsible for the environmental impact and consequences of the waste thrown by the waste trucks.)
Looks good to me.--Launchballer 06:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 17[edit]

Mercantile Library Company (Philadelphia)

(
)
  • Source: No single source but can be connected from here and here
5x expanded by AdoTang (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

AdoTang (talk) 04:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • @AdoTang: Hi, I'll be reviewing this.
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article properly expanded, no copy vio. Sources used appear reliable. I've done some minor copy edits. ALT0 is rather uninteresting and dull, ALT1 in the hook it is mentioned as "subscription library" and this term has been used in the lead as well, but with no citation although the fact is cited later on in the History section. But as DYK hook rules suggest, the terms used in the hook should be cited in the article somewhat as is. Currently, the cited description in the history section does not mention the word subscription, and the sources do not mention it directly, which is fine here as we can calibrate that easily from the stated info. But it'd be better if you made a mention of that word in that section as well. ALT2 is the most interesting of the bunch. However, it needs a bit of rewording. The source cited mention "due to concerns over Asbestos" but the hooks states directly "due to asbestos". This should be reworded. Moving to ALT3, it feels rather mundane. Ping me once you've made the adjustments. Regards. X (talk) 02:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Xoak: I've decided to lean into ALT2 and ALT3. Reworded ALT2 as you suggested, and clarified what I was going for with ALT3 (the interest part was that it was only added after it was closed). Half-considering adding an ALT4 about how the Modern building was the first such building to be added to the Register, but I'm banking mainly on ALT2, which I agree is the most interesting. I was also thinking of adding another hook about how the 1877 fire originated from Fox's American Theatre considering it was in DYK recently, but I can't find a source that clearly states the connection and I doubt it would be particularly interesting to anyone except Philadelphia architectural historians. AdoTang (talk) 16:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Approving with strong preference for ALT2.X (talk) 17:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AdoTang and Xoak: I've had to pull this article from queue, since I don't believe that Mural Arts Philadelphia or OCF Realty are reliable sources. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron: I have added another reference for ALT2 to the article Source: [Philadelphia Daily News Tue, 22 Aug 1989 Page 32 via Newspapers.com "The Mercantile Library - the business oriented branch of the Free Library of Philadelphia - has been forced to close due to an asbestos-related problem."]. TSventon (talk) 20:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Xoak:, I have copied the sentences with disputed sources to the talk page and removed them from the article. Can you recheck and reapprove the nomination? @AdoTang: has not edited for a week, but hopefully will return in due course. TSventon (talk) 11:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New reviewer needed unless Xoak returns. Z1720 (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AdoTang: The sentence 'In 1952, the Mercantile Library moved to a newer building at 1021–1023 Chestnut Street, part of the site of the former Chestnut Street Opera House.' needs an end-of-sentence citation.--Launchballer 11:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure how much I like there being three references for it, but it does comply with WP:CLUMP and it checks out to ref #6 (Hidden City Philadelphia), so approving.--Launchballer 06:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 20[edit]

Praetoria of Constantinople

(
)
Theodorus and Theophanes
Theodorus and Theophanes
Created by Alessandro57 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 83 past nominations.

Alex2006 (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: you are right, sorry, QPQ done. Alex2006 (talk) 05:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: AGF on non-English sources, although was able to verify the basic facts elsewhere. Only concern would be the last sentence of the introduction: "At least two buildings with this function existed in the city". It is unclear if this is talking about jails, or places where the prefect dispensed justice. @Alessandro57: - Are you able to address this? CSJJ104 (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, @CSJJ104:, it wasn't clear, thanks. Updated everywhere with sources. Alex2006 (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alessandro57: Reading this with the recent additions, is the article intended to cover both buildings, or just the one? If it's covering both then possibly it should be moved to Praetoria of Constantinople, otherwise the article should make clear which building it covers. CSJJ104 (talk) 12:49, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo @CSJJ104:, your concern has been addressed: article moved to plural. Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 14:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Performed a copyedit on the lead, but otherwise good to go. I assume good faith on the non-English sources. CSJJ104 (talk) 17:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jerzy Kosinski: A Biography

(
)
Created by Piotrus (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 512 past nominations.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

That's ok, Piotrus. I think it's hard to come up with this because the article doesn't really summarize the contents of the book. The article summarizes several reviews of the book, but we don't have the context of what they're reviewing.
Not to create too much more work, but would it be possible to get a short summary of the book in the contents section? It could be similar to the main Jerzy Kosinski article, plus even one sentence about the viewpoint/thesis of the author. If that's too much of a pain, plan B would be to scrape something from the review section. I can do my best to come up with something, but it would definitely be easier with more about the contents of the book. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shooterwalker, The problem is that the reviews do not, as far as I recall, provide any comprehensive information on the book's contents, which I assume is a biography of Kosinski, and the reviewers assume everyone will figure that out, I guess. They do not talk about chapter structure or such, just occasionally engage with some parts of his biography presented in the book the reviewer found interesting. And there is the issue of trying to make this article (and hook) be about the book and not about Kosinski's biography, which after all is a different article... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's okay. We can work without it. I think the hook would end up overlapping with aspects of the subject of the book, but let me see what I can come up with. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Piotrus How about this:
  • ALT1a: ... that Jerzy Kosinski: A Biography described its subject as a "liar", and yet, one reviewer felt that the author's "studiously neutral position ends up sounding like an apologia for Kosinski".
It leaves out a lot, but hopefully refines the original idea to invite more curiosity. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shooterwalker, Sure, it's likely more interesting that what I came up with. I've no problem "adopting" it so you can approve it :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds good to me. I approve ALT1a. (I also don't mind if another editor wants to come by with further revisions.) Shooterwalker (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus and Shooterwalker: An article comprising of one lead sentence, two single-sentence sections and one six paragraph Reception section comprising 92% of the article is a unmitigated WP:DYKCOMPLETE fail.--Launchballer 07:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Launchballer, Nope. The article pretty comprehensively covers the topic; there is not much else to write about it. I scoured the sources for anything relevant and it is already here. You can't call an article incomplete if there is no source covering other stuff, whatever that other stuff would be. Catalogue bibliographic information + reception is all that exists on this and all that we can therefore include. PS. That said, I'll expand the lead a bit more, since it is too short and did not cover the aforementioned reception. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a bit better; I've knocked together the two short sections per MOS:OVERSECTION. I'd question whether merely stating the obvious is enough given "an article about a book that fails to summarize the book's contents [...] is likely to be rejected as insufficiently comprehensive", but I'll hear from another promoter. I also don't see how any of the hooks on this page meet WP:DYKINT; I can suggest the following: ALT2: ... that a New York Times reviewer felt that Jerzy Kosinski: A Biography was perhaps "written in unusual haste" despite being written five years after Kosinski's death?, but you'll need an end-of-sentence citation.--Launchballer 08:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Launchballer, Citation added but isn't repeated the same footnote in two consecutive sentences also against MoS? And tnx for the hook idea, it is fine and we can consider it as well. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know this might take a significant amount of research, but is it possible to skim the primary source, and offer some more detail about the book's contents? I imagine it overlaps with his actual life story, and we wouldn't need a full read to gather that. Reading the bio would be more to look for a few examples of the author's overall thesis and tone. A couple sentences in this article would do it. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shooterwalker, It's possible, and probably should be done for GA and certainly for FA, neither of which I am however interested in taking this article to. There's also a question whether sourcing a plot to the work itself is or isn't OR; I've heard different opinions on this.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Piotrus Sorry this process has been drawn out. I still think ALT1a is fine, and nothing against ALT2 either. Ideally, the article would try to summarize the author's thesis and tone, even just with one or two sentences. But I believe it is at least close to meeting WP:DYKCOMPLETE, as is. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Piotrus I agree with you. This article meets the standard for WP:DYKCOMPLETE, and more detail would only be needed for a WP:GA. I want to reiterate that this DYK is ready, running with ALT1a. (But ALT2 would be a fine backup choice.) Shooterwalker (talk) 23:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shooterwalker cannot approve their own hook; I'll be promoting ALT2 unless ALT1a is desperately needed, in which case it needs an independent review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see how ALT1a meets WP:DYKINT.--Launchballer 16:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But is it otherwise valid Launchballer? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Er, no. "Liar" needs an end-of-sentence citation.--Launchballer 17:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 22[edit]

Lois E. Trott

(
)
Lois E. Trott c.1893
Lois E. Trott c.1893
Created by Xoak (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.

X (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article was created on 22 May 2024. It has a readable prose size of 3211 characters. QPQ not yet done. WP:EARWIG shows now copyvios. More comments later.

Each paragraph has a source. Some parts of the lead and the section "Early life and education" sound very similar to the text in Moulton 1893, p. 722. This needs to be rewritten to avoid WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. I didn't check the rest of the article so please make sure that the problem is not found in other parts as well. The hooks are interesting and supported by the source. Both hooks are too long: they should be below 200 characters and ideally below 160 characters. The picture is freely licenced, used in the article, and clear. Phlsph7 (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Phlsph7: thanks for your evaluation. Some parts of the lead and the section "Early life and education" sound very similar Because they are similar. I've used it as a source material, and "the article merely presents standard facts for a topic like this in standard sequence. The article does not copy any creative words or phrases, similes or metaphors." And a direct comparison with the Moulton source shows no violation. However, all of these becomes irrelevant here because the dictionary is in public domain and properly attributed in the source section. Regardless PD or not, the article does not closely paraphrase, rather presents standard facts in an orderly sequence. WP:LIMITED exists. Although redundant, I've now added a PD template as well in the ref section (which is usually done if it's a case of somewhat direct copy-paste, although this isn't the case here). Re the blurb's lentgh, while nominating I made sure they are under 200 characters. And yes shorter blurbs would be better. We may simply remove the "American educator" bits: ALT0b ... that Lois E. Trott (pictured) ran the first lodging house for homeless girls in America, providing shelter and support for over 1,000 girls annually, all without receiving any payment? ALT0c... that Lois E. Trott (pictured) ran the first lodging house for homeless girls in America, providing shelter and support without receiving any payment?

Let me know which one you prefer or if have your own opinion. Regards. X (talk) 07:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The template should solve the close-paraphrase problem. I wasn't aware that the phrase "(pictured)" does not count towards the character limit (per WP:DYK200), which means that the original hooks pass the test. I think all that remains is the QPQ. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
QPQ Done. Thanks. X (talk) 08:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 24[edit]

List of Green Bay Packers Associated Press All-Pro selections

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 43 past nominations.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Will probably have to disagree here. Readers might still not necessarily get what it means to be an "All-Pro" or how it is a big deal. Historically, our sports hooks have tended to underperform and be criticized as only appealing to sports fans, and I can't see how this hook or angle is any different. A completely different angle is probably needed here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 15:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
. Requesting a second opinion. I.e. from another editor please. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonzo fan2007: What about something like:
ALT2: ... that the Green Bay Packers once had 14 players selected to the national All-Pro team?
I don't necessarily love the current hook, but I think the article has potential for something interesting to be picked out from it. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine with ALT2 hey man im josh. Thank you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For anyone reading, I'm commenting for clarity that I am not reviewing this nomination, I just proposed an alternative hook. This still needs a reviewer. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The whole article needs a review.--Launchballer 17:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. I think ALT2 is interesting enough and so that one is approved. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar Studios (production company)

(
)
Created by Zingo156 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Zingo156 (talk) 16:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Sam Kee Building

(
)
Side view of the Sam Kee Building
Side view of the Sam Kee Building
  • Source: Moliere, Ashley (May 25, 2021). "Built on a Bet: An inside Look at the World's Narrowest Building". CBC News.
5x expanded by Yue (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

Yue🌙 03:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The fivefold is borderline met here as per my calculation. All other criteria are fulfilled. I've done some minor copy-editing. ALT0 is the most intriguing of the 3. X (talk) 08:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xoak and Yue: It is short of the 5x expansion by my computation. Expansion start:2190 finish:9508. For a 5x expansion it should be 10950 characters. So 10950-9508=1442 characters short. I will see if editors are ok with an IAR exemption. Bruxton (talk) 18:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bruxton: I calculated based on prose size, per WP:DYK5X. I used the prose's word count, which was 296 words before my edits and 1501 words after my initial expansion. I now see that the criteria is characters and not words, which I would be short by 73 (1905 × 5 = 9525; 9525 − 9452 = 73). However, I would argue that, whether it be 73 by my calculation or 1442 by yours, the article has been significantly expanded in the spirit of the guideline. Yue🌙 20:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Xoak and Yue: You can get this tool so you see how I worked out the math. User:Shubinator/DYKcheck. It is short 1442 characters not 73. Discussion at WT:DYK seems to be for running your article even though it is short. So I will continue my checks. Bruxton (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure I have ever seen a sentence cited to a map in this way, source for "In 1912, Vancouver City Council expropriated without compensation 2,199.24 square feet (204.316 m2), or about 79 per cent, of the above-ground portion of the lot." I do not have time to stick with this so will allow another promotor to check this out before promotion. Bruxton (talk) 22:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yue, do you intend to return to this? If not, per your comment at WT:DYK], this nom will be rejected. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AirshipJungleman29: As in, do I intend to make up the remaining characters? I tried adding a bit, but I do not think there is enough verifiable content out there to reach that threshold. If the promoters do not agree on an exception for this nomination, then I am fine with it being rejected at this time. Yue🌙 20:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 26[edit]

Ludwig Krug

(
)
Limestone relief
Limestone relief
Moved to mainspace by Ogress (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 402 past nominations.

SL93 (talk) 10:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long enough and was published to mainspace same day as DYK submission. It's well-sourced and copyvio free. The first hook is interesting, and the image meets criteria and adds to the hook. ALT1 is a little too wordy in my opinion, I think the original is better. Hook source is good. QPQ done. However, the last paragraph of the article is written in a stilted way, with semicolons connecting too many ideas, leading to it becoming difficult to read by the end. I would recommend going back and breaking some of those ideas up to make it easier to read, or at least adding "and" in front of the Solnhofen Limestone part. Other than that, there's nothing else that needs to be corrected. Kimikel (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kimikel I have edited the paragraph. SL93 (talk) 00:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Command information newspaper

(
)
5x expanded by Cielquiparle (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 63 past nominations.

Cielquiparle (talk) 22:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Per WP:NEWSORG, the source would be primary. It could be attributed to the author, but it's a hard fact. Could the citation be switched to a secondary source? Rjjiii (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy pings to @Cielquiparle and ViperSnake151: Bruxton (talk) 15:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More courtesy pings to @Cielquiparle and ViperSnake151: Bruxton (talk) 18:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold until this is resolved. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I actually did some research and while I didn't find an alternate source about this exact incident, I did find a source for related circulation numbers. How about rewording to:
ALT1: ... that according to a witness, 80,000 copies of a command information newspaper were dumped into the South China Sea during the Vietnam War? Cielquiparle (talk) 21:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rjjiii and ViperSnake151: check please. Bruxton (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say this works better. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cielquiparle: Why not a "former military journalist" as the article puts it? Rjjiii (talk) 03:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ... that according to a former military journalist, 80,000 copies of a command information newspaper were dumped into the South China Sea during the Vietnam War?
@Rjjiii: OK. Have struck ALT0 and ALT1 for now; I thought of expanding the article so that ALT1 could work too but will just leave it. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2 looks good. Rjjiii (talk) 04:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 29[edit]

MT Petar Hektorović

(
)
Created by ThaesOfereode (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

ThaesOfereode (talk) 02:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long enough, and well sourced throughout without copyvio. Article is new enough (DYK submitted 5 days after creation). All three hooks are interesting; I think ALT1 is the most interesting and eye-catching, but personally, I would replace "online post" with "online memorial" to better characterize what the resident wrote. All hook sources are reliable. All in all, there's nothing else to comment on regarding the article. @ThaesOfereode: let me know what you think of replacing "post" with "memorial," then I'll approve it either way. Kimikel (talk) 20:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 30[edit]

List of individual body parts

(
)
toe used for cocktails
toe used for cocktails
arm of Thomas Aquinas
arm of Thomas Aquinas
Created by Gobonobo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 119 past nominations.

gobonobo + c 23:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Everything looks good to me! A very interesting list. Preference is for either toe hook. Noting that DYK Check shows less than 1500 characters, but the text in the list proper is well over the limit  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 31[edit]

Republica weatbrooki, Republica (plant)

( Comment or view )
( Article history links:
)
Republica hickeyi leaf
Republica hickeyi leaf
  • ... that while both are named from the same place, the genus Republica (pictured) is not the genus Republica?
  • Source: Archibald & Cannings 2021 doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4966.3.11 materials and methods for location data "We examined a single fossil in lacustrine shale recovered from exposure B4131 of the Tom Thumb Tuff Member

of the Klondike Mountain Formation at Republic, Washington, U.S.A."

Wolfe & Wehr 1987 doi:10.3133/b1597 page 2 fig 1 shows the location in Republic of site 8428 of the Klondike Mountain Formation, page 22 gives the genus etymology and 23 the type locality occurrence in Republic
Created by Kevmin (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 351 past nominations.

Kevmin § 00:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: My first time reviewing a dual-article nomination, and I appreciate the effort which must have gone into it!

Both articles moved to mainspace yesterday. QPQ is done. No plagiarism detected via Earwig. For both articles, length, referencing and image licensing are all good. For the insect, I think that the first paragraph of "Description" and of "Paleoenvironment" are both a bit long and ought to be split up a bit, and that "Paleoenvironment" should have at least one image - even the location map over at Klondike Mountain Formation would be really helpful. For the plant, you really should move the distribution images a couple of paragraphs down to avoid MOS:SANDWICH, and the last sentence of the lead is missing a period. Still, I would not hold up the nomination for those reasons alone.

To me, it is the hook which has multiple significant issues. It may not be grammatically correct (shouldn't it be named after the same place, not named from the same place?), it is really confusing and vague, as you have no way to tell what place is actually being referred to without clicking on both links, and I feel that a lot of readers would just say "So what?" when they see it as currently written. Suggested wording: Alt1 "...that extinct plants and damselflies from the Eocene were discovered and named after Republic in Washington?"

I also think that both articles should have a sentence which makes this connection between the two more explicit than the mere hatnote at the top. Lastly, you should at least add DOI and ISBN links to your DYK citations. Right now, there is no way to tell which citation refers to which fossil without going through the articles' references, and we should not have to do that. InformationToKnowledge (talk) 13:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

InformationToKnowledge The hook as written is a play on the hemihomonym use of the genus name Republica for both a plant and an animal, but I like alt1 as well. I've added the dois for each source and a map to Republica weatbrooki, plus added splits in the Description and Paleoenvironment sections. A sentence calling out the hemihomonymy has been added to each article under classification. The image/map placement for Republics (plant) is more problematic though. I edit on a wide screen desktop monitor, and my view of the article has the maps already almost all the way down to the start of References. Ideally I was wanting a single map, but I wasn't able to find one I could make work for the West coast sites plus Alaska.--Kevmin § 18:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Taking conciseness into account and a matching the details of the articles:

Alt2 "...that fossil plants (pictured) and damselflies from the Ypresian were named after Republic in Washington state?"

Kevmin OK, that addresses all my concerns. Thanks for the prompt response! InformationToKnowledge (talk) 17:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kevmin and InformationToKnowledge: Whereas the original hook is one of the most eye-catching I have seen in a while, ALT2 is rather averagely dull. Can we not try to get the original to working order? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The information for Alt0 is present in both articles, based on the original descriptions of each.--Kevmin § 16:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully the reviewer InformationToKnowledge feels the same. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We may be waiting a while for them, as they haven't edited since the 14th, and the frequency of edits was tapering off before that.--Kevmin § 18:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 1[edit]

Rosemary Miller

(
)
  • ... that Rosemary Miller tried out skeet shooting in 1961, won her state's championship in 1962, and then won a state shooting championship all but two years for the rest of her life?
Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 187 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new enough, long enough, and within policy. The first two parts of the hook are verified, but I am having trouble understanding the last part of the hook. The wording is confusing. We need a new hook.4meter4 (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @4meter4: What I am trying to communicate is that, after she first entered the championship in 1962, there were only two years for the rest of her life that she did not win a state shooting championship. Can you think of a better way to word it? I also added a QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BeanieFan11 and 4meter4: ALT1 ... that after winning her state's skeet shooting championship in 1962, Rosemary Miller won a state shooting championship in all but two years for the rest of her life? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chenqiao Mutiny

(
)
Zhao Kuangyin is proclaimed emperor
Zhao Kuangyin is proclaimed emperor
  • Source: Hung, Hing Ming (2014). Ten States, Five Dynasties, One Great Emperor. Algora Publishing. ISBN 978-1-62894-072-5.
  • Reviewed:
Created by Lyn1644 (talk) and TheLonelyPather (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Lyn1644 (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • AGF on the source, as I don't have access to it. Article is eligible, in good shape (fully cited, well written), and I can't find any evidence of copyvio. No QPQ needed. Looks like we're good to go here. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 2[edit]

Nexz

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Lullabying (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 50 past nominations.

lullabying (talk) 22:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough, long enough. QPQ is done. AGF on the Japanese- and Korean-language sources for plagiarism etc. Hook isn't the most earth shattering, but it does seem to be the most interesting fact in the article.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 3[edit]

LACE (satellite)

(
)
LACE being serviced before launch
LACE being serviced before launch
"The Delta's thundering ascent marked the first time the Defense Department purchased a rocket and launch services from a private company instead of NASA."
    • ALT1: ... that the 150 ft (46m) long retractable booms on the LACE satellite (pictured) were the longest ever put in space at the time of launch?
    • Source: Amato, Ivan. "13". Taking Technology Higher The Naval Center for Space Technology and the Making of the Space Age (p. 252)

https://www.nrl.navy.mil/Portals/38/PDF%20Files/Taking_Technology_Higher_Amato.pdf "In the initial days and weeks after the LACE launch, he and colleagues spent many hours at the Blossom Point ground station in southern Maryland checking the spacecraft’s systems, which included, among other superlatives, the longest retractable

booms that had ever flown in space"
    • ALT2: ... that the Ultraviolet Plume Instrument onboard the LACE satellite (pictured) tracked rocket plumes from space for the United States's Star Wars program?
    • Source: Naval Research Laboratory (October 1, 1991). "LACE" (PDF). Defense Technical Information Center. Washington DC: Naval Research Laboratory. Retrieved April 4, 2024.

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA339075.pdf (p. 2): "SDIO [Strategic Defense Initiative Organization] began discussing the addition of an instrument to take video images of rocket plumes by their UV emission."

Images on pp. 20-22, some color versions at https://web.archive.org/web/20070916140820/http://code8200.nrl.navy.mil/uvpi.html, or on Commons
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: Hook: technically LACE was launched alongside another "Star Wars" satellite as a dual payload on the same rocket, however, LACE was deployed first so it still was the "first" satellite launched/deployed in the mission

AltHook: I would love to say that these were the longest booms *ever* deployed in space, but I haven't found any up-to-date sources or papers stating that.
AltHook2: "Star Wars" is the popular nickname for the Strategic Defense Initiative program

Created by SpacePod9 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

SpacePod9 (talk) 08:47, 6 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: main, ALT1 and ALT2 all verified Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 5[edit]

Chihiro (song)

(
)
Billie Eilish and Finneas performing in 2022
Billie Eilish and Finneas performing in 2022
  • ... that "Chihiro" by Billie Eilish was titled in reference to the main character of Spirited Away? Source: ref: "Chihiro" is named after the protagonist from Hayao Miyazaki's 2001 film "Spirited Away," a fantastical coming-of-age journey that's been widely celebrated for its multi-layered storytelling and animation style.
    • Reviewed:
Created by Dxneo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

dxneo (talk) 23:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: earwig gives 41%, but the copied text is a cited quote from Eilish. the image is fine, but i'd suggest using a newer photo for both this hook and for the article. there are quite a few good ones here: c:Category:Billie Eilish - O2 Arena - 6/16/2022. i'd also suggest adding Eilish's name somewhere in the hook, e.g. Billie Eilish's "Chihiro". overall, good work. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 22:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sawyer. However, I'm afraid changing the image might later be marked as a breach of WP:DYKIMG which is what happened here, but if you think I should go through with it then I'll gladly replace the image. dxneo (talk) 00:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
dxneo i understand that. my suggestion is that you change the image both in the hook and the article to something newer (as the current picture is from when she was 16), but as i said it's just a suggestion from me, and not something holding back the hook. i believe all of the photos from the category i linked are CC BY 2.0, which is perfectly suitable. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 00:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sawyer, no problem. Most of the images listed in that category do not have description, which is making it difficult to add the image in the article. Please feel free to go on ahead and replace the image. dxneo (talk) 00:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
dxneo done - found an image that also has both Billie and Finneas performing together, to keep the same vibe. hope it suits you :) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 01:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gedling Town F.C.

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Curlymanjaro (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.

Curlymanjaro (talk) 12:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

Image eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article nominated for DYK within 7 days of reaching Good Article status. The article is long enough, has over 1,500 words of prose, and is properly cited. Earwig picked up a copyright violation 0%, maing it unlikely. QPQ is done. AGF on locked sources. The article in general has a lot of red links and I think that, if there are no plans on creating those articles, they should be removed. Hook is cited, but it doesn't seem particularly interesting to people outside of fans of football, so another one is recommended. lullabying (talk) 02:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 ... that Gedling Town F.C.'s nickname "The Ferrymen" was inspired by the name of a pub located near the team's stadium?
@Lullabying and Curlymanjaro: How does this sound? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lullabying and Narutolovehinata5: Hi both. I based the original hook on a previous DYK of mine. I think it's also fair to say it's difficult to find an interesting fact about a grassroots football team that isn't also about football. However, if we prefer Naruto's suggestion, how about: ... that Gedling Town F.C.'s nickname "The Ferrymen" was inspired by the name of a pub located next to the team's stadium? Curlymanjaro (talk) 22:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer ALT1 or ALT1b. Good to go. lullabying (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Dürrenberg burial

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Merytat3n (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Merytat3n (talk) 23:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long enough and recently given GA status. It is presentable, well-sourced, and neutral. Earwig looks fine. The hooks are both cited and interesting. QPQ is not required. gobonobo + c 18:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Esther Tailfeathers

(
)
Created by Valereee (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 72 past nominations.

Valereee (talk) 19:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@Ornithoptera: Valereee (talk) 19:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: New enough, long enough, sourced and plagiarism free according to Earwig. The hook has been previously approved and everything seems to check out with me. If there are no issues everything should be fine with me. Great job Valereee, you've done an amazing job in taking initiative creating this article. Ornithoptera (talk) 21:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ornithoptera and Valereee: I find it concerning that both the source given for the hook and the source in the article for the marriage don't actually name the father/husband. I see it in [4], which is used in the articles, so that source should be replicated. Noting also that the relevant Bjarne Store-Jakobsen sentence has not been adapted to note the film has two stars. CMD (talk) 00:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting here that I've pulled Bjarne from prep; it can go back in when Esther's been approved. I've added the reference myself.--Launchballer 09:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

per DYK Talk Valereee (talk) 11:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'll complete the review since I've somewhat started, pretty much confirming the work of Ornithoptera, and I echo the appreciation of the quick work here. Since it's in the hook, also a quick note of appreciation to Ornithoptera for the detailed article on what seems quite an impactful person.
This article is new and long enough. It is adequately sourced. Running a few spotchecks I found no plagiarism (unless "a member of the Kainai First Nation" is not a common phrasing, which I feel it is but this is not an area I am highly versed in). I mentioned one sourcing quibble above, and noticed but did not mention the far too short lead, but Launchballer handled both of these. On the hook itself, I do not have access to two of the sources used across both articles, but it is backed up by the source I mentioned above which is already in both articles. Before approval, I note the Bjarne Store-Jakobsen article and the Esther Tailfeathers article frame the hook sentence a bit differently, either they are joint focuses or he is the main focus. The wikilinks to the Esther Tailfeathers article should also be adjusted on the Bjarne Store-Jakobsen article, as they don't seem to reflect the page creation. I would also like to know which source mentions the divorce, as I didn't find that in my spotchecks. Best, CMD (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Chipmunkdavis, thanks for the review! I've asked Ornithoptera to take a look at those three sections, as they have seen the film while I don't have access to it. From the reviews it looks like we could possibly tweak to

ALT0a: ... that the "mythical love story" of Sami politician Bjarne Store-Jakobsen and Blackfoot physician Esther Tailfeathers is a focus of the 2014 film Bihttoš?

As the film deals not only with his and his wife's relationship but also with that of him and his daughter, and the film investigates how his experiences in the residential schools informed those relationships. Valereee (talk) 13:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me as an alt. It doesn't sound like the whole film is easily encapsulated in 200 characters, but the mythical love story aspect is hooky and prominent in the relevant sources. Waiting for Ornithoptera to confirm, I am copying over the relevant DYKmake coding here which should™️ ensure it gets copied over when this is promoted to my understanding. CMD (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Chipmunkdavis:! Thank you for taking the time to go through the article. There are a few questions that are raised in this discussion that I have missed that I will do my best to answer. Stofjell's article Elsewheres of Healing: Trans-Indigenous Spaces in Elle-Máijá Apiniskim Tailfeathers' Bihttoš is the primary source in terms of mentioning the divorce ("Tailfeathers uses Bihttoš totell the story of her parents’ marriage and divorce against the backdrop of agrowing global Indigenous rights movement") and Elle-Maija's mother ("The interspersed archival photographs are well-lit, but the liveaction sequences, featuring Elle-Máijá, her Kainai mother Esther Tailfeathers") and father ("Among other things, it is also very much a film honoring her father (“Áhčči”), Bjarne Store-Jakobsen"). If I have missed any other questions that require addressing please let me know and I'll do my best to adjust accordingly! Ornithoptera (talk) 16:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, and thanks all for the edits made to the articles. Go for ALT0a multi-hook then. Best, CMD (talk) 00:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 6[edit]

Fume hood

(
)
  • Source: Energy Use and Savings Potential for Laboratory Fume Hoods "[...] Fume hoods create large amounts of airflow, which drives the overall HVAC sizing and energy requirements of the buildings in which they are located. For standard two-meter (six-foot) hoods, per-hood energy costs range from $4,600 for moderate climates such as Los Angeles, USA to $9,300/year for extreme cooling climates such as Singapore."
Improved to Good Article status by Reconrabbit (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Reconrabbit 13:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Prose size (text only): 26275 characters (4175 words) "readable prose size", Article created by Geoff on June 14, 2003 and promoted to GA on 6/6/24 , Article was promoted to Good Article status on June 6, 2024. No QPQ required. All hooks are interesting. I could not find the relevant section in the reference for ALT2, could you provide the relevant quote? If not, ALT0 and ALT1 can pass. awkwafaba (📥) 18:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    ALT2 is one thing that I found interesting, but wasn't able to confirm in my limited knowledge of Polish. It was a very old addition - maybe it's not entirely true? Machine translation roughly indicates that "obudowa rolet okiennych razem z silnikami elektrycznymi" (window shutter roller blind with electric motors) were present; this may be a mistranslation of the fume hood object as it is depicted in the article. This item is also specifically described as used "for decoration". Reconrabbit 19:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • ALT0 and ALT1 approved. I'm torn with which one is better, ALT0 is probably better information to know, but ALT1 probably will drive more clicks in. As for ALT2, I will hold the foreign-language reference in good faith enough to stay in the article, but as the other hooks are strong we should just go with them. awkwafaba (📥) 20:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: ALT0 and ALT1 approved awkwafaba (📥) 22:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

María Pacheco

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Grnrchst (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 36 past nominations.

Grnrchst (talk) 09:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment – I will review this nomination. – Editør (talk) 09:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Review – The article is new enough (passed as GA on 6 June 2024), long enough (12000+ characters of prose), has no copyright issues, and is presentable (both per Talk:María Pacheco/GA1). The originally proposed hook is cited and interesting. Although the linked source is not available without an account, I was able to confirm the information by other sources [5] [6], so I don't see an issue here. I want to propose an alternative that focuses more on María Pacheco instead of her husband and avoids changing 'Toledo' into the modern 'Toledo, Spain', let me know if there are any issues with ALT4 before I pass it. – Editør (talk) 10:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    ALT4 ... that María Pacheco led the Revolt of the Comuneros in the Kingdom of Toledo after the death of her husband?
    No issues with ALT4, although I personally think ALTs 1, 2 and 3 are more interesting. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok. I also thought ALT2 was interesting, but I couldn't find an alternative source for this to confirm this information; do you have one? And I would propose to change it to remove the modern 'Spanish' and the article 'the' because there were more leaders into: – Editør (talk) 12:59, 23 June 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]
    ALT5: ... that 16th-century chroniclers thought María Pacheco, a leader of the Revolt of the Comuneros, was a witch?
    Good point about dropping the apocryphal use of "Spanish", I think ALT5 looks good as well. Here's the direct quote from Fleming 2018, p. 270:

    Her actions drew the ire of contemporary chroniclers, who depict her as a tyrannical virago. Having earlier commented that she dominated her marriage as the “husband of her husband,” Martire links her protagonism to madness, and even to demonic possession; Santa Cruz relates it to witchcraft. Like Juana’s moriscas in earlier days, Pacheco’s were looked upon askance. Fray Guevara describes Pacheco working with a “mad” slave or “great witch,” who stoked her ambitions.

    --Grnrchst (talk) 13:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    pass ALT5. – Editør (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 7[edit]

2018 Malang mayoral election

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 228 past nominations.

Juxlos (talk) 08:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Wu shu (history)

(
)
  • ... that the compilation of the Wu shu was hampered by the execution of two of of the compilation committee's members?
  • Source: in the article
  • Reviewed:
Created by Kzyx (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Kzyx (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • No QPQ needed. Hook is interested, although you really should list the source again here; it's de Crespigny, Rafe (2018). Generals of the South: The Foundation and Early History of the Three Kingdoms State of Wu. This checks out, however. Article seems in decent shape, although might need a round of copyediting; it's presentable, but some of the sentences are phrased a little clunkily. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 01:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 8[edit]

Barbara's Rhubarb Bar

(
)
  • Source: "One thing we need to clear up: Contrary to the English translation on many videos of the song, including Wartke and Fischer’s official YouTube video, rhabarberkuchen is — repeat with me! — not rhubarb pie... Of all the elements of a proper rhabarberkuchen, the streusel topping seems most non-negotiable. Hansche remembers her mom making “rhabarber-streusel-kuchen” — a crumb cake with a layer of poached rhubarb and a streusel made from flour, butter, and sugar — as part of a “kaffe und kuchen” (coffee and cake) afternoon tradition." --Morgan, Audrey (May 8, 2024). "Why Is a Rap Song About Rhubarb Cake Blowing Up on TikTok?". Food & Wine. Same source, and multiple others cited on the page, document the "barbarians" in the song lyrics.
Moved to mainspace by Tryptofish (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

Tryptofish (talk) 22:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Cinema of Guinea-Bissau

(
)
  • ... that to encourage the development of Bissau-Guinean cinema, one foreign filmmaker provided the country's film institute with cameras, lights, and a Steinbeck guitar?
  • Source: Laranjeiro, Catarina (2021), Blum, Françoise; Kiriakou, Héloïse; Mourre, Martin; Basto, Maria-Benedita (eds.), "The Bissau-Guinean Cinema: A Nation", Socialismes en Afrique (in French), Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, pp. 519–535, doi:10.4000/books.editionsmsh.51480., ISBN 978-2-7351-2698-9, retrieved 2024-06-08
  • ALT1: ... that Amílcar Cabral sent four Bissau-Guineans to learn film technique in Cuba, hoping to stimulate filmmaking in the country? Source: Arenas, Fernando (2017). "The Filmography of Guinea-Bissau's Sana Na N'Hada: From the Return of Amílcar Cabral to the Threat of Global Drug Trafficking". Portuguese Literary and Cultural Studies: 69. ISSN 2573-1432.
  • ALT2: ... that much of the early cinema of Guinea-Bissau was lost after the country's 1980 coup? Source: Cavoulacos, Sophie (June 8, 2024). "MoMA Presents: Filipa César's Spell Reel". MOMA. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
  • Reviewed:
Created by Lbal (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Lbal (talk) 22:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Well done! Nominator is exempt from QPQ. The article was created within a week at the time of nomination and exceeds the minimum length for DYK. The article is generally within policy; I did make a copyedit to fix some typos and linkage issues. A basic copyvio check found no concerns. Sourcing is sufficient and high-quality. All of the hooks are cited and mentioned within the article, and I believe they pass our standards for interesting hooks. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zhang Zhenglang

(
)
Created by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 54 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 01:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go! But, out of curiosity, where was "My Ten Years at the Institute of History and Philology" published in 1998? In a journal, or somewhere else? Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 20:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @A Thousand Doors: in 新學術之路: 中央研究院歷史語言研究所七十周年紀念文集, Volume 1 (1998) [A New Academic Road: Collected Works Commemorating the 70th Anniversary of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Volume 1]. But the version I use was from the Peking University website - I'm kind of unsure how to cite it in this case. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 9[edit]

Gordon Cooper (American football)

(
)
  • ... that football player Gordon Cooper performed so well that "the adjective supply [was] exhausted" in trying to describe him?
Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 190 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: When including the one day extension, the article is indeed new enough. I find the hook to be interested, and the source, being AP, is credible. The fact is also mentioned in the article. Marking as approved. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC) Hey man im josh (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hypochrysops piceatus

(
)
  • ... that the bulloak jewel is arguably Australia's rarest butterfly?
Created by Ornithoptera (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 33 past nominations.

Ornithoptera (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Was new enough at the time of nomination. Both hooks look good, maybe the first one sounds more interesting. Htanaungg (talk) 10:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kirkby Ski Slope

(
)
  • Source: "Building work began on the development, located between Kirkby Stadium and the M57, in November 1973.

Predicted to open to the public in 1974, the slope encountered numerous issues, such as vandalism and problems with the surface and, in 1975, the project was abandoned."

Taken from: https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/merseysides-back-front-ski-slope-17597070
  • Reviewed:
Created by LicenceToCrenellate (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

LicenceToCrenellate (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Happy to confirm this interesting and well researched article --AntientNestor (talk) 07:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for taking the time to review it. I've added a citation that backs up the claims about the lack of railings and the surface.LicenceToCrenellate (talk) 22:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver season 4

(
)
Title card of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver
Title card of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver
Moved to mainspace by MyCatIsAChonk (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.

MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 19:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long and new enough as well as well written and copyvio-free. However, I would prefer that you cite another reliable, independent source for the critical reception instead of using Rotten Tomatoes, which, while reliable on its own, is not an arbiter of critical consensus; you can still report on the RT scores, though. Hooks are cited both in this page and article, but I prefer ALT1 (that is, with another independent source as I've said) for obvious reasons but with some minor alterations:

ALT0 seems dull and reliant on readers' knowledge of award-giving bodies. Title card image, which is freely-licensed, seems more decorative than encyclopedic within the context of this DYK, so I seriously doubt it's gonna make it to the main page. Since QPQ has been given, this should be good to go once the issues are addressed. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nineteen Ninety-Four guy, thanks for the review: better sources for ALT1 are The AV club and Bustle. ALT1a looks good! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 11:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just clump those sources in the article while also rewriting the sentence into, Some critics described the show as necessary comic relief from the activities of the Trump administration., and then remove The fourth season was generally well received from Critical reception and leave the Rotten Tomatoes bit as a standalone sentence. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: done, thank you! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Approving ALT1a. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 12:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sydnie Christmas

(
)
Created by Launchballer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 234 past nominations.

Launchballer 21:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review: Newly expanded article from a redirect meeting the required length size of prose. BLP is notable to exist as a standalone article now passing WP:ARTIST. No apparent copyvios. QPQ done. Rest article seems fine. Problem comes with only the fact that this is a synthesis and hence not perfectly verifiable. Do we have any another source mentioning her to be the first woman winner without a dog? Or else, do we have anything else from the article to a new hook? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's in HuffPost, which I've added back to the article.--Launchballer 08:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great! All set to go. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Spreeman

(
)
Created by Hameltion (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 59 past nominations.

Hameltion (talk | contribs) 02:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 10[edit]

Infested

(
)
  • ... that with the horror film Infested, French filmmaker Sébastien Vaniček wanted to show how not frightening but "complex and beautiful" spiders are?
Converted from a redirect by Cavarrone (talk). Nominated by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 22:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article new and long enough at the time of nomination. Length and referencing adequate ("Plot" isn't but that's MOS). No copyvio per Earwig aside from the block of interview quote. Hook interesting, cited inline. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 16:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamtime (climb)

(
)
The line of the Dreamtime 8C (V15) graded bouldering route is marked in green
The line of the Dreamtime 8C (V15) graded bouldering route is marked in green
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Aszx5000 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Aszx5000 (talk) 15:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • article is long enough, recently promoted to GA and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ not needed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aszx5000 and Gonzo fan2007: Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook. Bruxton (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Considered" and "one of" make this less bold. I think the article supports both assertions, but if the nominator wants to add an additional source to back it up, it wouldn't hurt. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks all, and here are some additional refs (i.e. Dreamtime and Midnight Lightning (climb)'s fame is easily verifiable in climbing): probably the most famous boulder in the world, https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/jernej-kruder-climbs-childhood-dream-dreamtime-cresciano.html, They are two of the most famous problems in the world of bouldering, with Dreamtime—arguably the first internationally famous boulder problem since Midnight Lightning. Just google +"dreamtime" +"boulder" +"famous", and you will get every major climbing magazine (per WP:NCLIMB). Hope that works. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 11[edit]

Na O-mi

(
)
  • ... that South Korean actress Na O-mi's stage name was inspired by "I Dream of Naomi" by the Israeli duo Hedva and David?
  • ALT1: ... that South Korean actress Na O-mi was cast by Shin Seong-il after placing second at a pageant that he judged? Source: http://www.cine21.com/news/view/?mag_id=22004
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: The citation for the first hook doesn't actually mention the name "Hedva and David", but it does say "the name Naomi comes from the hit song 'Naomi in a Dream,' sung by an Israeli mixed duet at the time." (Of course, I'm translating this from Korean, so the title won't match up 100%, but 꿈속의 나오미 is what the song was titled in Korea) Also I could cut the "South" in South Korean if it's obvious enough she's not from the North.
Moved to mainspace by Redalert2fan (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Wuju Daisuki (talk) 16:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Korean-language sources were checked for close paraphrasing; no issues arose. I strongly prefer the original hook over ALT1. I do not think that the lack of an explicit mention of the Israeli duo's name in the original Korean source is a significant problem. If the promoter does deem it so, however, the hook could be reworded like so:

"... that South Korean actress Na O-mi's stage name was inspired by the song 'I Dream of Naomi'?"

I also added "the song" and "singing duo" to the original hook for clarity's sake.

"... that South Korean actress Na O-mi's stage name was inspired by the song "I Dream of Naomi" by Israeli singing duo Hedva and David?"

I hope this nomination succeeds. Yue🌙 21:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1940 NFL All-Star Game (January)

(
)
5x expanded by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • As a Lions fan, am I allowed to just reject this outright? (kidding) Article is new enough, long enough, and well sourced. Earwig appears to be down, but a spot check of sources showed no issues. QPQ done. Hook is interesting, but I worry that in going for "hookiness" it might go too far towards being misleading. The Packers were one of the teams in the game, but is that the same as the players being "selected" for the game, as those for the actual all-star team were? What about wording it something closer to
ALT1: ... that the entire Green Bay Packers team was chosen to play in the 1940 NFL All-Star Game?
@Gonzo fan2007: What do you think of this? It's still "hooky" while hewing a little closer to fact, in my opinion. But despite my joke earlier, I'm not deliberately trying to be difficult and am open to other suggestions. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 23:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DrOrinScrivello, that actually was going to be my original hook, but then I questioned whether "played" was factually correct. There aren't a lot of great sources for an 84 year old game, and I can't be certain that every player actually "played" (there were at least 2 injuries for Packers players noted before the game). "Select" is kind of the word used by the NFL for being chosen to the Pro Bowl and is consistent with List of Green Bay Packers Pro Bowl selections. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All that to say I don't really mind either ALT if you think ALT1 is fine. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that "select" is what you usually expect to see in most Pro Bowl situations, but it seems to me that on this particular occasion the players themselves weren't "selected" per se. Maybe a way to get around the "play" issue would be to say,
ALT1b: ... that the entire Green Bay Packers team was chosen to compete in the 1940 NFL All-Star Game?
I think this is mostly hair splitting, though, and would not argue if the promoter choses any of the three options. Assuming my suggestions didn't alter the original enough for this to be considered approving my own hook (in which case I'm fine with another reviewer being requested), I think this is good to go. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 23:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unpromoted per WT:DYK.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RoySmith (talk • contribs) 14:06, June 18, 2024 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on June 12[edit]

Music Sounds Better with You

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by LunaEclipse (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.

lunaeclipse (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Since I am a relatively new user (est Dec2023), I am not sure if ALT0 violates NPOV. But regardless, I prefer ALT1 JuniperChill (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tobie Goedewaagen

(
)
Tobie Goedewaagen
Tobie Goedewaagen
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 668 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I am assuming in good faith that the Dutch refs adequately support the text and that there is no plagiarism. I've done a general search myself as to the subject of the bio in English sources. There were some deletions made to the article of the word Nazi here; restoring the word would help make this properly neutral in accuracy, and I would be happy then to pass this final item of the qpq. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:FD8F:5C17:CABB:9E61 (talk) 20:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DYK admins: I started working on this, but my comments so far are not showing up .. am I doing something wrong in format? 2603:7000:2101:AA00:FD8F:5C17:CABB:9E61 (talk) 20:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Looks good. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:900D:526B:7A29:78AD (talk) 02:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 13[edit]

Chicken of Tomorrow Contest

(
)
A white rock chicken, the winning purebred of the contest
A white rock chicken, the winning purebred of the contest
  • Source: "rbor Acres White Rocks’ white feathered birds beat the competition in the purebred category, but Red Cornish crosses from the Vantress Hatchery definitely outperformed them. And as it happens, those two breeds would eventually be crossed and become the Arbor Acre breed – whose genetics now dominate poultry farms worldwide."

"Before long, Arbor Acre’s parent stock had supplied all the major broiler companies in America."

Modern Farmer
Created by Thriley (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 135 past nominations.

Thriley (talk) 02:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Newly created in mainspace on 13 June, the day of nomination, by moving from Draftspace.
  • Length is acceptable, at just over 2,000 bytes. Correctly rated Start-class.
  • No obvious close paraphrasing or copyvio noted in spot-checks of sources, but I tweaked a couple of phrases which could have been considered too close to the source.
  • The image is PD because copyright has expired. If used, the hook would need to have something like (White Rock chicken pictured) appended. It is used in the article, so no issues there.
  • Sourcing and referencing is fine: everything is referenced, and to decent-quality sources.
  • No issues with neutrality, POV etc.
  • The hook fact is sourced and interesting – in fact quite remarkable. Length of the hook is fine.
  • QPQ review has been done.

An interesting story. Verified and good to go. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastiaan Matheus Sigismund de Ranitz (1901–1987)

(
)
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 670 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@Crisco 1492 and Cunard: Question: how do we know he was defended by a nephew? The translated source says The defender, Mr. H. de Ranitz, cousin of the suspect Bruxton (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Cunard and Bruxton: Looking into it, neef is one of those lovely words that mean two completely different things (nephew or cousin, even the Dutch Wikipedia page is basically a dab). Without more on his family, "relative" is the best we can do. How about ALT1 ... that the Nazi collaborator Sebastiaan de Ranitz abandoned his office following Mad Tuesday, leaving his department in turmoil?
That's supported by both Wesselink, Claartje (2014). Kunstenaars van de Kultuurkamer: Geschiedenis en Herinnering [Artists of the Kultuurkamer: History and Memory]. Bert Baker. and the PDC.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Verified that the hook is sourced in the article and is interesting. The article notes: "Claims that Breda had been liberated were broadcast on 5 September, leading many Nazis to flee the Netherlands for Germany. De Ranitz left the Hague for the Kultuurkamer's regional office in Groningen, and though work continued, his absence caused the institution and its parent department great difficulty."

"were broadcast" links to Dolle Dinsdag, which is Mad Tuesday. Cunard (talk) 08:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the hook in the article. Bruxton (talk) 20:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing Watermelon

(
)
  • Source: 1
Created by Morgan695 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 164 past nominations.

Morgan695 (talk) 18:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: No - Not yet complete
Overall: Nominator still needs to complete QPQ, but otherwise it looks good. It might be good to add in the Production and release section that it had a theatrical re-release in 2024, distributed by Kani Releasing. AdJHu 胡 00:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pigeon statues in Wellington

(
)
Created by Panamitsu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 41 past nominations.

―Panamitsu (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • This is indeed a very interesting article and the hook is also interesting. The source is notable and I don't see any issue in the article. The main issue is the hook itself. The hook is telling us that people built a shrine after the statue was stolen. But what the source given for it says is slightly different. The news article says "On Reddit, Wellingtonians mourned Cub St’s missing bird by laying flowers and candles at its former perch". It is not even a shrine. The reporter didn’t call it a shrine, the reddit post calls it a shrine and we shouldn’t take the reddit as the reliable source. So @Panamitsu: you need to edit the hook a little bit. Or you can propose alternative hook. Or search for sources directly mentioned it as a shrine. Then ping me and I continue my review. Mehedi Abedin (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mehedi Abedin: The source shows a Reddit post saying "Someone's set up a shrine for the missing pigeon". I've also looked up shrine in the Oxford dictionary, which says "a place associated with or containing memorabilia of a particular revered person or thing", so I personally think that it is fine to call it a shrine even if the source doesn't (directly) say it. What do you think? ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Panamitsu: Well I guess we don't have to be so perfect. Although I think that using the word "memorial" would be better. By the way, I am gonna pass this hook anyway. Mehedi Abedin (talk) 03:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The hook is good to go. However if the promoter has any issue with the word "shrine" then they can replace it with "memorial". I am going to add ALT hooks here in case any other issue occurs. Mehedi Abedin (talk) 03:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song)

(
)
  • ... that the Colombian singer Feid collaborated for the second time with an American hip hop producer in "Luna", and it was called "an effort to take the genre to the global level"?
Improved to Good Article status by Pollosito (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Santi (talk) 04:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nom is three days after GA promotion, passed a GA review, all good. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Miraclepine: That's what I meant, only for me adding another alt and having it approved is equivalent to changing it in some way. I'm sorry for making you think I was literally going to change what's above. Well, here it goes:
    ALT1: ... that the Colombian singer Feid performed "Luna" as the only song at the 2024 Copa América opening ceremony, but there were several technical issues in the transmission? Santi (talk) 20:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18th Lok Sabha

(
)
  • ALT: ... that according to the Indian Women's Reservation Bill, 2023, 33% of women MPs will be required although Lok Sabha formed in 2024 has only 14%?
    • 5x expanded by Dharmadhyaksha (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 66 past nominations.

    §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC). General eligibility:[reply]

    Policy compliance:

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: Yes
    • Other problems: Yes
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Approved only for ALT hook proposed by me. Mehedi Abedin (talk) 11:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 14[edit]

    Benjamin Jackson (sailor)

    (
    )
    • Source: Pages 197 and 198 of this book detail how Benjamin Jackson enlisted in the Union Navy in May 1864 as a substitute for a US citizen named Lewis Saunders, who was drafted, but had the opportunity to pay for a substitute to take his place. The fee Jackson received was likely at least $300. Because Jackson served as a substitute, he was enlisted under the Saunders name.
    5x expanded by Dugan Murphy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.

    Dugan Murphy (talk) 22:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
    • Interesting: Yes
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Can't find any mention of 300 dollars in the book, accepted in good faith. TheNuggeteer (talk) 07:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Brunel University lecture centre

    (
    )
    Brunel University's lecture centre in 2024
    Brunel University's lecture centre in 2024
    Created by Suntooooth (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

    Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 22:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Created (moved from draftspace) on 14th June.
    • Long enough, and graded at B-class.
    • Decent sources: NHLE listing particulars (extensive), a journal article with more than a passing mention, book about the university (I have checked this via WebArchive) and a couple of newspaper pieces. No issues around notability.
    • QPQ review has been done and is awaiting action from the article's nominator. (Edit to say that this is one of the DYK nominations affected by the blocking of the article nominator Evrik as detailed here, which I hadn't realised until checking WT:DYK today. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 12:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC))[reply]
    • Re. The lecture centre was finished in 1966 or 1967: surprising that Historic England has not been able to pin down the completion date, but I have checked the listing particulars and other sources and it is indeed the case.
    • Image is suitably licensed, was taken by the article author, is used in the article and looks fine at thumbnail size.
    • All statements are sourced. No issues with neutrality.
    • No copyvio or close paraphrasing noted. There are a couple of phrases which cannot really be reworded without losing their meaning.
    • Hooks: both are fully verified. ALT1 is better; I wonder if it might be worth including a reference to the building's use in A Clockwork Orange to grab attention. Something like: ...that Brunel University's "imposing" and "frightening" lecture centre (pictured) featured in A Clockwork Orange? (another editor would need to sign off that hook).
    Happy to mark this as verified. Note to prep builders: see my comment above on a possible ALT2 hook which I have suggested. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 21:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 15[edit]

    Joan (Alexander McQueen collection)

    (
    )
    • ... that the flaming finale of Joan by Alexander McQueen has been read as an image of violence, transcendence, resurrection, and resilience?
    • Source:
      • Bethune, Kate. "Encyclopedia of Collections". In Wilcox (2015), pp. 303–326. (Violence)
      • Spooner, Catherine. "A Gothic Mind". In Wilcox (2015), pp. 141–158. (Transcendence/Resurrection)
      • Fairer, Robert; Wilcox, Claire (2016). Alexander McQueen: Unseen. (Violence/Resurrection)
      • Wilson, Andrew (2015). Alexander McQueen: Blood Beneath the Skin. (Resilience)
    Created by Premeditated Chaos (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 53 past nominations.

    ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • The article is long enough, new enough, and neutral. The hook is directly cited. I assume good faith on the references that I cannot read. A QPQ has been completed. Ready. SL93 (talk) 00:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks for the review. I can send screencaps of anything if anyone does want to check the sources (GBooks has Unseen and Blood Beneath, I think). I just tweaked firery -> flaming as I think it flows more nicely. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Gmac Cash

    (
    )
    Created by Reppop (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    reppoptalk 08:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    Timeline of Partygate

    (
    )
    Boris Johnson's 56th birthday party
    Boris Johnson's 56th birthday party
    • Source: "Mr Johnson is the first serving PM to be sanctioned for breaking the law." BBC News
    Moved to mainspace by A Thousand Doors (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 25 past nominations.

    A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 20:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Comment not review As this is an article featuring election candidates, it should not appear on the main page until after 4 July, see WP:DYKELECT. TSventon (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • New enough and long enough. QPQ present. This is a unique contribution to DYK as it is three paragraphs and a list; even though one paragraph does not end in an inline citation, I am treating it as a lead-section paragraph. All the list bullet points contain at least one inline citation. The hook fact checks out and is included. Image is OGL-licensed and acceptable for the Main Page. Good to go after 4 July per above. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Gloria Dickie

    (
    )
    • ... that environmental journalist Gloria Dickie did her thesis on how cities in Colorado changed garbage laws to prevent bear incursions?
    Created by Silver seren (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 122 past nominations.

    SilverserenC 20:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 16[edit]

    A Stroke of the Pen: The Lost Stories

    (
    )
    • ... that early in his career Terry Pratchett had published short stories in newspapers, which remained unknown until they were posthumously discovered and republished in the 2023 book A Stroke of the Pen?
    Created by Al83tito (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    Al83tito (talk) 04:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Article - Created 16 June, nominated 19 June: 4688 words: sources reliable, including source of hook: article is presentable. Hook - meets criteria of verifiability, interest and format. Good to go.Smerus (talk) 13:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Zhou Wennan

    (
    )
    Created by Toadboy123 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 36 past nominations.

    Toadboy123 (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    Banana (2024 video game)

    (
    )
    Created by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 56 past nominations.

    Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • @Generalissima: Article looks good, QPQ is done, etc. When I first saw the hook I wasn't sure if "second most played" referred to a concurrent count, or of a number of purchases in the past month or all time. I think it might be better to add something to the effect of "concurrent". You passed me in DYKs :(. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I do have some major doubts about this "game"'s notability. Mainly, I think it fails WP:SUSTAINED, as it appears to be a flash-in-the-pan phenomenon that quickly drops off the radar and there is nothing to really talk about with regards to its content. I am not sure if DYK articles are required to pass notability criteria (the guidelines simply say "reliably sourced") but it risks coming off as advertising if a non-notable gimmick reaches the main page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Zxcvbnm: I feel the article pretty plainly meets GNG. It's covered in-depth in a wide variety of reliable sources for a month now, including Forbes. Even "gimmicks" are notable if they get significant, reliable coverage. (And no, notability is not a DYK thing. If it gets AFD'ed thats another issue.) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 05:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • The only sources in the article are from a 2-week timespan from the beginning of June to a few days ago. That, to me and likely most other editors is not a sustained span of time in which the "game" is discussed. That goes into the realm of Wikipedia as news website rather than as a lagging indicator of notability. "Brief bursts of news coverage" do not demonstrate notability. There's a possibility that several months from now, the "game" will still be major, but we are not a crystal ball. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Zxcvbnm: But lots of games have articles relatively soon after release. How can we say *any* game will or won't have coverage? Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          • Usually games have some degree of pre-release announcements and whatnot even before it comes out, with release day only cementing its notability. I'd say literally any game article that is created shortly after a game is announced is frowned upon for being WP:TOOSOON. I'm not saying it should be deleted now, but it does risk being deleted at a later date if its popularity fails to last. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oen Boen Ing

    (
    )
    • ... that Dr. Oen Boen Ing used his own money to pay for some patients' prescriptions?
    Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 671 past nominations.

     — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Excellent article. Neat guy.
    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Earwig marked ~40% for the Wacana PDF, but a spot check indicates that it's probably due to the foreign language element and particular phrasing like "fun fairs"; I didn't see any serious issues. Promoter, feel free to double-check my work; this is my first QPQ review. ThaesOfereode (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 17[edit]

    Radcliffe Telescope

    (
    )
      • Reviewed:
    Created by Clearfrienda (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    C F A 💬 01:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: The article is new, the article is properly sourced, the article is neutral and plagiarism free, the hook is properly cited, the hook is interesting, and you don't require a QPQ, good to go! TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Joseph Tetley

    (
    )
    • Source: The Prow, a website run by several New Zealand libraries, says: "Adjusted to 2017 rates, Tetley ran off with under $7,000,000 NZD." And the same source mentions the appointment to the Legislative Council.
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ōsakishimojima
    • Comment: Right, so this has just been on the main page as a minor link and got attention by 12 editors during the 24 hours on DYK (which is quite a bit for a New Zealand topic). The major expansion during that period was by HotMess. I've done some more expansion since and it's gone from 753 bytes of readable prose (prior to 17 June when expansion started) to 4753 bytes; more than the required 5x expansion.

    And whilst we do have a mugshot for the subject, it's of poor quality and thus not worth including in this nomination.

    5x expanded by Schwede66 (talk) and HotMess (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 146 past nominations.

    Schwede66 06:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Looks good to go. Aszx5000 (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Band of Angels (novel)

    (
    )
    Created by MattMauler (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    MattMauler (talk) 03:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
    • Interesting: Yes
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: Looks good, thanks for expanding the article! I'm partial to the initial hook, but either of the ALTs will work too. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Kho Ping Hoo

    (
    )
    • ... that Kho Ping Hoo, despite writing numerous stories based on wuxia, could not read Chinese?
    • Source: Sawega, Ardus M. (22 July 1994). "Asmaraman Kho Ping Hoo: "Saya Telah Iklas Pergi ..."" [Asmaraman Kho Ping Hoo: "I've Accepted My Departure ..."]. Kompas (in Indonesian). Jakarta. p. 20.
    Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 672 past nominations.

     — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:08, 17 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 18[edit]

    Fu Wuji

    (
    )
    • ... that Fu Wuji's Fuhou gujin zhu includes information on everything from astrological signs to the dimensions of imperial tombs?
    • Source: B.J. Mansvelt Beck, "The Treatises of Later Han" pp.129-130
    • Reviewed:
    Created by Kzyx (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    Kzyx (talk) 21:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
    • Interesting: Yes
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: The article is okay, and the hook is interesting, the source is a book source but accepted. TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    WUEC

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 691 past nominations.

    Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 19[edit]

    Judy Kellogg Markowsky

    (
    )
    Created by SL93 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 407 past nominations.

    SL93 (talk) 23:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    L'Aube rouge (novel)

    (
    )
    • Source: Adejunmobi, Moradewun (January 1994). "History and Ideology in Jean-Joseph Rabearivelo's Prose Works". Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines. 28 (2): 219–235. doi:10.1080/00083968.1994.10804351. ISSN 0008-3968.
    Created by Zanahary (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

    ꧁Zanahary꧂ 03:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 20[edit]

    Giado concentration camp

    (
    )
    The Giado concentration camp in Libya's Nafusa Mountains
    The Giado concentration camp in Libya's Nafusa Mountains
    • ... that Libyan Jews and Arabs traded and bartered with each other at the fence of the Giado concentration camp (pictured)? Source: Hoppe, Jens (2018). "The Persecution of Jews in Libya Between 1938 and 1945". In Boum, Aomar; Abrevaya Stein, Sarah (eds.). The Holocaust and North Africa. De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9781503607064-003
    • ALT1: ... that prisoners at the Giado concentration camp (pictured) in Libya made a makeshift synagogue in one of their barracks?
    Created by Zanahary (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

    ꧁Zanahary꧂ 06:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: The article is eligible for a copyright violation, therefore instantly making it ineligible for DYK, a large amount of direct paraphrasing is stated in the blockquotes, (I suggest changing the wording). TheNuggeteer (talk) 07:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    In the blockquotes? Those are directly quoted (non-paraphrased) survivor testimony. Are they excessive? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 12:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry about my mistake, I accepted it, I could not read WP:BLOCKQUOTE.TheNuggeteer (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Dorothy Dworkin

    (
    )
    Dorothy Dworkin
    Dorothy Dworkin
    • Source: Lesley Barsky, From Generation to Generation: A History of Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital pages 9–10: "The first nurse in charge of the dispensary was Dora "Dorothy" Goldstick, who was to become a driving force behind Mount Sinai Hospital. Born in Windau, Latvia, in 1890, Goldstick had gone ... to train in midwifery. After receiving her diploma from the Medical State Board of Ohio in 1909, she returned to Toronto" and page 131 "with the assembly of hospital matriarch Dorothy Dworkin and a group of escorts"
    Improved to Good Article status by Reidgreg (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 22 past nominations.

    Reidgreg (talk) 13:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Comment I will review this nomination. – Editør (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review – The article is new enough (promoted to GA on 20 June 2024), is long enough (8000+ characters of prose), has no copyright issues, and is presentable (both per Talk:Dorothy Dworkin/GA1). The hook is cited and interesting. Although the linked source is not available without an account, I was able to confirm the information by other sources [10] [11], so I don't see an issue here. The image is properly licensed, clear in a smaller size, and used in the article. I thought the most remarkable fact from the article are the thousands of people that she helped immigrate from Europe to Canada to escape the Holocaust, did you consider this for the hook? – Editør (talk) 16:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • I did, but I wasn't sure that 'helped' was strong enough for a good hook. (Her husband and brother-in-law also participated with the travel business, though she is usually singled out as the "rainmaker" who 'made things happen'). Anyways, I thought someone might have a problem with independent sources being a little weak on the specifics. Following is one I'd considered (using 'hundreds' for the 1930s, probably needs some rephrasing). – Reidgreg (talk) 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • ALT1: ... that during the 1930s, immigrant midwife Dorothy Dworkin (pictured) ran a labour hall, raised funds for a hospital expansion, published a newspaper, and helped hundreds of European Jews escape the Holocaust?
        I see, thanks. I think ALT1 lacks focus, so I prefer the original hook.
        pass the original hook – Editør (talk) 00:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 21[edit]

    181 Montague Street

    (
    )
    181 Montague Street
    181 Montague Street
    Created by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 658 past nominations.

    Epicgenius (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: TheNuggeteer (talk) 12:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Charlemagne

    (
    )
    • Source: Paul E. Dutton, Charlemagne's Mustache: And Other Cultural Clusters of a Dark Age, pp. 59-61
    • Reviewed:
    Improved to Good Article status by Seltaeb Eht (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    Seltaeb Eht (talk) 23:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: The hook and the article have no problems; this is my second review, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. TheNuggeteer (talk) 03:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (
    )
    • Source: "The book stuck with Smith, a local dentist, for so long that a few weeks ago, at age 62, he climbed the Matterhorn himself." [12]
    • ALT1: ... that Banner in the Sky was inspired by the first ascent of the Matterhorn? Source: "In 1865, an Englishman by the name of Edward Whymper became the first man to climb the ... Matterhorn. ... Ullman took inspiration from this real-life account when ... [writing] Banner in the Sky." [13]
    • ALT2: ... that before writing Banner in the Sky Ullman climbed the Matterhorn with his son? Source: "Ullman has come up with a superb mountain-climbing story for young readers. The author and his son recently climbed the Matterhorn" [14]
    • Reviewed:
    Converted from a redirect by Andrewa (talk) and TipsyElephant (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    TipsyElephant (talk) 12:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
    • Interesting: Yes
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: The source stated at both the dyk and the article needs a specific login to a school/institution. This is my third review, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. TheNuggeteer (talk) 03:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 22[edit]

    Supernovae in fiction

    (
    )
    Artist's impression of a supernova
    Artist's impression of a supernova
    • ... that in fiction, supernovae (pictured) are induced to serve as weapons, power sources for time travel, and advertisements?
    Improved to Good Article status by TompaDompa (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.

    TompaDompa (talk) 21:59, 22 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • article was recently promoted, is long enough and is within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ is complete. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Georg Kareski

    (
    )
    Created by Buidhe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 246 past nominations.

    (t · c) buidhe 05:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Hi Buidhe (talk), review follows: article created 22 June; article is on the shorter side but exceeds minimum length; sources look to be reliable for the information cited; a QPQ has been carried out; hook fact is interesting and stated in the article. I don't have access to the academic sources cited but happy to assume they support the statement, the JTA contemporary source reports the fact. I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing from the sources I could access. Looks fine to me, interesting article/subject - Dumelow (talk) 12:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 23[edit]

    A9 dualling project

    (
    )
    Created by JuniperChill (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    JuniperChill (talk) 10:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    Ascension Island Marine Protected Area

    (
    )
    Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.

    CMD (talk) 14:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Cobra Crack

    (
    )
    Climber standing at the distinctive 'Cobra' silhouette groove at the start of the Cobra Crack
    Climber standing at the distinctive 'Cobra' silhouette groove at the start of the Cobra Crack
    Improved to Good Article status by Aszx5000 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

    Aszx5000 (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 03:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 24[edit]

    East House mass shooting

    (
    )
    • Source: "Two brave police officers who disarmed a man with a gun who opened fire, killing three people in a Sheffield pub, have been honored for their actions ... Despite only having truncheons and knowing that Mohamed Ismail had a gun, the men called for him to come out. When he refused, they kicked the door through, disarmed Ismail and 'potentially prevented further death'" from:Horrobin, Natalie (26 June 2023). "True crime: Cops honoured for disarming man with gun who killed three in Sheffield pub". The Star (Sheffield). Retrieved 24 June 2024.
    Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 846 past nominations.

    Dumelow (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough

    Policy compliance:

    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: (t · c) buidhe 00:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi buidhe, thanks for the review. I was going by the sources which use "murder", but see your point. I have switched out the wording in the article - Dumelow (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 25[edit]

    Catherine G. Williams

    (
    )
    Created by SL93 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 408 past nominations.

    SL93 (talk) 02:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Hi SL93, review follows: article created 25 June and exceeds minimum length; article is well written (I made some minor changes, feel free to revert if you want); article is cited inline throughout to reliable sources for the content cited (I don't think the claims cited to the funeral home exceed that allowed by WP:ABOUTSELF); I didn't pick up anything too worrying on a check for close paraphrasing (NB: Earwig is thrown off by the long quote and proper names); hook is interesting enough for me, mentioned in the article and checks out to source cited; a QPQ has been done. I have one query regarding the hook "award-winning" is listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch, I wonder if "... that Iowa Social Worker of the Year" Catherine...) might be a good way to combine award-winning, location and occupation? Let me know - Dumelow (talk) 09:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No problem, ALTa good to go - Dumelow (talk) 07:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ashin Munindabhivamsa

    (
    )
    Created by Battlesnake1 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

    Htanaungg (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: The article appeared in the news before, and the hook does not seem interesting because these types of killings are common. Considering the reply of the nominator. I feel life ALT2 is more interesting. TheNuggeteer (talk) 00:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @TheNuggeteer: Thank you for the review. Per WP:DYKNEW, I’ve mentioned in the comment that the subject is listed only in RD section of the ITN, not bold link.
    Although this type of killing may be common elsewhere, it is a rare case in the highly religious country that a prominent religious figure was shot dead by the ruling junta’s soldiers. Plus, it is very few that the junta apologized publicly; he would never show his weakness in public.
    I’d like to nominate another ALTs:
    Regards, Htanaungg (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Software maintenance

    (
    )
    Improved to Good Article status by Buidhe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 247 past nominations.

    (t · c) buidhe 00:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • The article is new enough (promoted to GA yesteday).
    • The article is long enough.
    • The article is well-sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant, and copyvio-free. Earwig at 4.8%, copyvio unlikely.
    • The article is presentable.
    • The hook is cited to a reliable source (I assume Ref9 in the article), the source is not linked in the DYK.
    • Images are in public domain.
    • QPQ done.

    Looks good to me. Vacant0 (talk) 11:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 26[edit]

    Windy Zhan

    (
    )
    Zhan in 2024
    Zhan in 2024
    • Reviewed:
    Created by Will629 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

    Will629 (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    • Hello, Will629. The nomination is timely and the article is long enough with no copyvios detected. Several entries in the Discography table, as well as the Awards and nominations table, appear unsourced, though. These would require references. I think it can use some tweaking for catchiness; how about this?--NØ 19:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • ALT1: ... that Windy Zhan (pictured) of the Hong Kong girl group After Class has been learning and practising vocal music since the age of five?
        • MaranoFan, thank you very much for your prompt review. I have corrected the issues and your question suggestion is very good, thank you! May I ask what do I need to do for using your ALT1 suggestion, as I am new for DYK in English Wikipedia. Thank you!--Will629 (talk) 19:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          • I have struck the first hook so ALT1 will be considered by the promotor, no further action required. Thank you for correcting the issues so quickly. Foreign-language reference accepted in good faith, this is good to go. Welcome to the English Wikipedia and best of luck here!--NØ 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ianto's Shrine

    (
    )
    Ianto's Shrine in 2024
    Ianto's Shrine in 2024
    • ... that a shrine (pictured) dedicated to the fictional character Ianto Jones is visited by people from around the world?
    Moved to mainspace by Suntooooth (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

    Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 02:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Good job! TheNuggeteer (talk) 06:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 27[edit]

    Pure Japanese

    (
    )
    • Source: The movie's trailer and poster
    Improved to Good Article status by Murasakihitsuji (talk). Nominated by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

    Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 08:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: GA DYK on approval day, satisfactory GAR, enough said. I prefer ALT0. BTW ALT2 and ALT3 aren't written in compliance with WP:DYKFICTION; ALT2 should clarify it is part of the production process, not the plot, and ALT3 is part of the plot. ミラP@Miraclepine 02:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 28[edit]

    ABC Cinema, Brighton

    (
    )
    The former ABC Cinema, Brighton, in 2016
    The former ABC Cinema, Brighton, in 2016
    • Source: Allen Eyles (2003), Brighton and Hove Cinemas, p.71. "At midnight on Thursday 8 January 1948, the world premiere of Brighton Rock took place at the Savoy (no other cinema was in the running, as it was made by ABC's associated production company)." (First sentence from a full paragraph about the premiere. The Savoy was the name of the cinema at the time, as noted in the article.)
    Created by Hassocks5489 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 99 past nominations.

    Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.chped.com/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know/Approved&oldid=1231630863"