Jump to content

User talk:ArkHyena

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, ArkHyena, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.



Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Hey, thank you for joining the discussion and giving me very important points (like JunoCam already being damaged at this point). Also, I hope you don't mind me asking: Are you a furry also? Thanks IapetusCallistus (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
heyo, tyy and indeed i am! ArkHyena (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArkHyena Heyo also. :3 Sorry I didn't receive any Notification from the system of Wikipedia that you replied. Anyways, yeah, I'm a yeen also. :3 Hopefully you are doing okay. IapetusCallistus (talk) 15:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
oh nice, another yeen!! and yeah, i'm doin alright right now :] ArkHyena (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArkHyena alright. It's nice to meet you then IapetusCallistus (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
if you wish, i do have other places of contacts where i'm much more responsive ArkHyena (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArkHyena hey there. Sorry I was busy: it's Chinese New Year in Taiwan right now and I attended a funeral (sadly it happened just before the festivities). Sure, let me know your alternative contact(s) if you are okay with that IapetusCallistus (talk) 12:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArkHyenaby the way, my Telegram is YeenMage IapetusCallistus (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regular moon[edit]

I reverted your (assumedly mistaken) edit on Regular moon without realising you'd already done so. Please feel free to re-add your minor edits prior to that, and sorry for causing you some extra work! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, of course, no worries! ArkHyena (talk) 19:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wright Mons[edit]

On 18 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wright Mons, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an unusual mountain on Pluto may have once erupted water instead of lava? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wright Mons. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wright Mons), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wright Mons[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wright Mons you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
It is so unbelievably cool that we have an article on the climate of Triton. Makes me proud to be a Wikipedian. Thanks and keep up the great work. jengod (talk) 03:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you! I'm glad that there are people out there interested in Triton and its many, much-underrated traits :) ArkHyena (talk) 21:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wright Mons[edit]

The article Wright Mons you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wright Mons for comments about the article, and Talk:Wright Mons/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 02:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cryovolcano[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cryovolcano you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Regular moon[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Regular moon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pencilsforall -- Pencilsforall (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Regular moon[edit]

The article Regular moon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Regular moon and Talk:Regular moon/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pencilsforall -- Pencilsforall (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Regular moon[edit]

The article Regular moon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Regular moon for comments about the article, and Talk:Regular moon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pencilsforall -- Pencilsforall (talk) 00:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ruach Planitia[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Ruach Planitia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! B3251 (talk) 23:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Climate of Triton[edit]

On 15 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Climate of Triton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Triton, a moon of Neptune, has thin clouds that are likely made of nitrogen ice crystals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Climate of Triton. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Climate of Triton), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ruach Planitia[edit]

On 22 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ruach Planitia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a large basin on Neptune's moon Triton may have once been filled with liquid water cryolava, similar to how liquid silicates fill lava lakes on Earth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ruach Planitia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ruach Planitia), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cryovolcano[edit]

The article Cryovolcano you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cryovolcano for comments about the article, and Talk:Cryovolcano/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste move[edit]

Hello! I've noticed in the recent changes log that you copied from Eagle (Meridiani Planum crater) to Eagle (crater). This is a "cut-and-paste" move and is discouraged. I've requested a history merge for now. I recommend requesting a move at WP:RM/TM instead in such cases. Thank you! ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 08:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(It's discouraged because of attribution, forgot to say that.) ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 08:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my apologies. Good to know! I'll keep that in mind for future moves. ArkHyena (talk) 08:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes of Mercurian craters[edit]

The infoboxes you have been replacing are not redundant. The ones you have removed included a link to the appropriate quadrangle (Debussy, Eminescu, etc). Please revert the edits or suggest another solution. Jstuby (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quadrangles can simply be included in the "location" section of the feature on celestial object infoboxes. Regardless, you're correct that I was hasty in my editing and that I should have been more careful; I'll go back and implement that change. ArkHyena (talk) 18:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've been hasty before as well. The way the crater infobox is set up is that a formula reads the coordinates and figures out the quadrangle, so there is no manual adding of the quadrangle. This works for Mercury anyway.

Your GA nomination of Pharos (crater)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pharos (crater) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cocobb8 -- Cocobb8 (talk) 23:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pharos (crater)[edit]

The article Pharos (crater) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pharos (crater) for comments about the article, and Talk:Pharos (crater)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cocobb8 -- Cocobb8 (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ArkHyena, I noticed this recently promoted GA was running out of time to be eligible for "Did you know", so I nominated the article at Did you know nominations/Pharos. Feel free to participate! ––FormalDude (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh cool! I hadn't initially thought of going forward with a DYK nom myself, as I assumed there was little an average reader would be interested in about the feature. Hopefully I'm proven wrong, though :) ArkHyena (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the second-awesomest natural satellite[edit]

Come, now, you can't just leave it at that and not tell us what the objectively awesomest one is. :) (If I might guess – Titan?) Double sharp (talk) 07:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot on, Titan of course! Perhaps a bit cliché, but I find no other moon manages to match its impressively exotic geology, atmosphere, and weather/climate. It's big, has an internal ocean, and gets extra points for being placed snugly in Saturn's awesome moon system. ArkHyena (talk) 23:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Titan would be one of my picks for awesomest too. It's just that, due to its etymology, I'd have some trouble not jokingly answering with Callisto. :) Double sharp (talk) 04:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, etymological justifications are more than welcome of course. Though, I suppose one could evaluate them from purely etymological grounds, in which case I'd have to answer with Hydra—its PIE root also meant otter! And of course, who could forget Dimorphos's (unfortunately) informal name, Didymoon? ArkHyena (talk) 06:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, since I saw you wrote regular moon, and because I find it amusing to ponder classification: would you generally consider Luna a regular satellite? I am inclined to think it stands somewhat apart, because while it wasn't captured, it's also far enough out that its precession is primarily controlled by the Sun. (I also am somewhat in two minds about Iapetus. Though of course, this is more a personal-opinion question, since I suspect the sources are generally in accord that these two are regular.) Double sharp (talk) 03:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So this is really fun to answer because "regular moon" seems to be one of those terms where astronomers/planetary scientists have this unspoken shared understanding that it's nebulous and no solid definition really exists internally, but nobody cares enough to improve on it since the problems it causes are small. Kinda like "dwarf planet", heh; I wish I could've addressed this in article, but unfortunately it seems to be one of those vibe-based quirks of astronomy nobody really codifies.
But there at least seems to be two "starter" definition based on my interpretation of usage: that "regular moon" is dynamic, i.e. that a regular moon is only a low-e low-i moon; or, that it's original, so that only moons that formed around a planet are regular. And annoyingly, there seems to be a lot of hybridization, so people often call Nereid an "irregular moon" regardless of origin hypotheses.
Based on the former, I'd probablly say yes? It's quite far out, but it's still a low-e low-i orbit. Certainly no worse than Hyperion or Iapetus, despite its awesome interactions with Solar tides. On the latter, ofc it'd also be yes, as it seems collisions also count as in-situ formation. So I guess yes in general?? ArkHyena (talk) 03:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the very illuminating reply! I likewise wish this could've been addressed too – it's interesting for Phobos and Deimos (and, considering some theories I remember, perhaps Amalthea)? :) Double sharp (talk) 03:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! Phobos and Deimos are weird because they're unequivocally regular moons in the dynamical sense, but due to capture hypotheses they're treated more as a toss-up. MMX should help clear that up (fully expecting an in-situ origin myself!), so that conundrum may not be around by 2030. ArkHyena (talk) 17:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cool! Now if only we get a Jovian irregular mission at some point. :) Double sharp (talk) 06:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.chped.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ArkHyena&oldid=1231427990"