Talk:Free trade agreement

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Free trade agreement article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Free trade agreement be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Requested move 12 December 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

result:
Not moved. Consensus not to move without supporting evidence, and enough time has passed to provide such evidence since requested. (closed by non-admin page mover) -2pou (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

– In standard English, hyphenation is required for the compound adjective. Capitalisation is correct only for a proper noun. Invert redirection or move page towards the correct spelling. Numerous articles already have the correct spelling and are not listed here. 83.228.144.229 (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Skeptical: Saying hyphenation is "required" in English in this situation is not really accurate. Such constructions are often found without hyphens as well. Without performing any real analysis, my impression is that the form without the hyphen is more common for most of these terms. "Euro-Mediterranean" should probably be "Euro–Mediterranean" (with an en dash). — BarrelProof (talk) 16:52, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I'm having a hard time finding a single instance of it being hyphenated. Walrasiad (talk) 23:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, absent evidence of this being the common usage for these phrases. BD2412 T 15:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unless there is evidence that this is common usage. (t · c) buidhe 05:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.