Jump to content

Template talk:Slavic languages: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 25: Line 25:
:Let's continue the discussion there. --[[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] 09:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
:Let's continue the discussion there. --[[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] 09:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
::Deletion of Slovio is a major mistake. The entry is alive and well in over 20 other Wikipedias, thus a rare example of voices missing in the English one. Slovio is also alive on the net, see at http://www.slovio.com/. Please '''restore''' the Slovio entry! [[User:MGTom|MGTom]] 23:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
::Deletion of Slovio is a major mistake. The entry is alive and well in over 20 other Wikipedias, thus a rare example of voices missing in the English one. Slovio is also alive on the net, see at http://www.slovio.com/. Please '''restore''' the Slovio entry! [[User:MGTom|MGTom]] 23:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
:::Slovio is not alive anywhere else except www.slovio.com , so it fails [[WP:N|notability criteria]]. --[[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] 05:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:41, 12 August 2007

Molise Slavic

Molise Slavic is really the only name for this microlanguage I had ever heard, but never mind. I saw that the Wikipedia community had chosen to use Molise Croatian dialect as the name for the article and to have Molise Slavic language redirect there. But this "Croatian dialect" is nowhere mentioned in the whole article Croatian language, so it has to be mentioned in this template. However, the template lists languages, not dialects. Consequently, if the template treated Molise Slavic as a Croatian dialect, then it could nowhere be found, not even via Croatian language. Therefore please either treat Molise Slavic in the article Croatian language or let us use the name Molise Slavic at least in the template (as non-Croatian scholars like Aleksandr Duličenko or Peter Rehder usually do). --Daniel Bunčić 17:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article should really be called Molise Slavic or Molise Slavic language, but Croatian Wikipedians would have us think otherwise. - FrancisTyers · 18:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I changed "Molise Slavic" to "Molise Croatian". I just applied the name of the page itself, just like it's case with other 36 links in the template. --Ante Perkovic 09:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, the question how to call that speech form should really be going on on Talk:Molise Croatian dialect. The main thing here is not to have dialect in the name, as we don't have language in other names, either. Thanks! --Daniel Bunčić 14:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian vs. Bosniac

Oh, please. That discussion is definitely decided. Bosnian is both the official name of that language (if it is a language; in my personal opinion it isn't, but that's not the question here) according to the Dayton Agreement and the constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the most common one in English. See the long discussion at Talk:Bosnian language#Naming. --Daniel Bunčić 17:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegrin disputed

Many "languages" here beside Montenegrin are disputed (Bosnian, Bunjevac, even Croatian), as there are not only true languages listed here, but dialects as well (Old Novgorod dialect, Banat Bulgarian). Therefore, it is not neccessary to mention that Montenegrin is disputed as a separate language. This template is a list of many Slavonic languages, dialects, and speeches. --Djordje D. Bozovic 23:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting of Slovio - to all Slavic users

Recently, article Slovio is deleted. As I've seen, no Slavic user from en.wiki contributed on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Slovio_(2nd_nomination), after the 2nd time was nominated for deletion.
This should't happen. This is one blooper, that Wikipedia cannot allow to itself. Slovio is most known constructed Slavic language, or put it this way, a constructed language with Slavic languages as its base.
Please, gave your opinion here. If we collect enough votes, we can try to bring it back to life and end any further nominations for deletions. Kubura 07:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied at Talk:Slavic languages.
Let's continue the discussion there. --Amir E. Aharoni 09:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion of Slovio is a major mistake. The entry is alive and well in over 20 other Wikipedias, thus a rare example of voices missing in the English one. Slovio is also alive on the net, see at http://www.slovio.com/. Please restore the Slovio entry! MGTom 23:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Slovio is not alive anywhere else except www.slovio.com , so it fails notability criteria. --Amir E. Aharoni 05:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]