Jump to content

Army General Classification Test: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Changed text to reflect the derivation of the GT score.
mNo edit summary
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Army General Classification Test''' (AGCT) has a long history that runs parallel with research and means for attempting the assessment of [[intelligence]] or [[multiple intelligences|other abilities]].<ref>Paul F. Ballantyne, ''Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism'' "[http://www.cyberus.ca/%7Epballan/C4P1.htm Chapter 4, Rise of Group Ability Testing] ... (1918–1932)'</ref>
The '''Army General Classification Test''' ('''AGCT''') has a long history that runs parallel with research and means for attempting the assessment of [[intelligence]] or [[multiple intelligences|other abilities]].<ref>Paul F. Ballantyne, ''Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism'' "[http://www.cyberus.ca/%7Epballan/C4P1.htm Chapter 4, Rise of Group Ability Testing] ... (1918–1932)'</ref>


[[World War I]] and [[World War II]] created the need for this type of testing and provided a large body of test subjects. The early emphasis (World War I) was on determining the level of [[literacy]] ([[Army Alpha#History|Alpha test]]) amongst a heterogeneous group. Illiterates were given [[Military psychology#Intelligence Testing in the United States Military|another]] test (Army Beta); some enrollees were interviewed. Subsequent testing targeted [[aptitude]] in order to better fill [[Role-based assessment|roles]], such as those provided by officers who obtained commissions from other than the [[United States military academies]], or to meet the need for increasingly complicated skills that came along with technological progress, especially after World War II.<ref>Paul F. Ballantyne, ''Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism'' "[http://www.cyberus.ca/%7Epballan/C5P1.htm Chapter 5, From Training Programs to World War II Testing] ... (1933–1946)"</ref>
[[World War I]] and [[World War II]] created the need for this type of testing and provided a large body of test subjects. The early emphasis (World War I) was on determining the level of [[literacy]] ([[Army Alpha#History|Alpha test]]) among a heterogeneous group. Illiterates were given [[Military psychology#Intelligence Testing in the United States Military|another]] test (Army Beta); some enrollees were interviewed. Subsequent testing targeted [[aptitude]] in order to better fill [[Role-based assessment|roles]], such as those provided by officers who obtained commissions from other than the [[United States military academies]], or to meet the need for increasingly complicated skills that came along with technological progress, especially after World War II.<ref>Paul F. Ballantyne, ''Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism'' "[http://www.cyberus.ca/%7Epballan/C5P1.htm Chapter 5, From Training Programs to World War II Testing] ... (1933–1946)"</ref>


As with other measurement attempts, the AGCT ran into controversy during the era of the [[Vietnam War]].<ref>Morris J MacGregor, Jr [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/20587/20587-h/20587-h.htm Integration of the Armed Forces 1940–1965]. [[United States Army Center of Military History]].</ref><ref>Paul F. Ballantyne, ''Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism'' "[http://www.cyberus.ca/%7Epballan/C7P1.htm Chapter 7, Questioning the Ideology of Testing] ... (1964–1981)"</ref> Yet, the requirement did not abate, leading to improvements in the application and use of the standard testing methodology.
As with other measurement attempts, the AGCT ran into controversy during the era of the [[Vietnam War]].{{clarify|Explain why|date=July 2023}}<ref>Morris J. MacGregor, Jr. [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/20587/20587-h/20587-h.htm Integration of the Armed Forces 1940–1965]. [[United States Army Center of Military History]].</ref><ref>Paul F. Ballantyne, ''Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism'' "[http://www.cyberus.ca/%7Epballan/C7P1.htm Chapter 7, Questioning the Ideology of Testing] ... (1964–1981)"</ref> Yet, the requirement did not abate, leading to improvements in the application and use of the standard testing methodology.


The modern variant of this test is the [[Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery]] (ASVAB) that was first administered in 1960.<ref>USMEPCOM [http://www.mepcom.army.mil/visitor-info.asp Your Future Begins Now, Testing] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070320234448/http://www.mepcom.army.mil/visitor-info.asp |date=March 20, 2007 }}</ref>
The modern variant of this test is the [[Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery]] (ASVAB) that was first administered in 1960.<ref>USMEPCOM [http://www.mepcom.army.mil/visitor-info.asp Your Future Begins Now, Testing] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070320234448/http://www.mepcom.army.mil/visitor-info.asp |date=March 20, 2007 }}</ref>


Many high [[High IQ society|IQ societies]], such as [[Mensa International|Mensa]], can map their entrance requirements to early AGCT scores.<ref>American MENSA [http://www.am.us.mensa.org/Content/AML/NavigationMenu/Join/SubmitTestScores/QualifyingTestScores/QualifyingScores.htm Qualifying Test Scores] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110819205555/http://www.am.us.mensa.org/Content/AML/NavigationMenu/Join/SubmitTestScores/QualifyingTestScores/QualifyingScores.htm |date=August 19, 2011 }}</ref> The AGCT was of interest to researchers due to the broad nature of the testee domain (1.75 million men took the original test). The [[Triple Nine Society]] accepts a minimum qualifying score of 157 (raw) for membership in its ranks, but only if the test was taken prior to 1976. Also, the TNS accepts a minimum qualifying score of 74 from the similar Naval General Classification Test (NGCT), but only from the years 1954–1977.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.triplenine.org/main/admission.asp |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2013-10-30 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140415094937/http://www.triplenine.org/main/admission.asp |archivedate=2014-04-15 }}</ref>
Many high [[High IQ society|IQ societies]], such as [[Mensa International|Mensa]] and [[Intertel]], can map their entrance requirements to early AGCT scores.<ref>American MENSA [http://www.am.us.mensa.org/Content/AML/NavigationMenu/Join/SubmitTestScores/QualifyingTestScores/QualifyingScores.htm Qualifying Test Scores] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110819205555/http://www.am.us.mensa.org/Content/AML/NavigationMenu/Join/SubmitTestScores/QualifyingTestScores/QualifyingScores.htm |date=August 19, 2011 }}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=Intertel - Join us|url=https://www.intertel-iq.org/join-us|access-date=2021-03-15|website=www.intertel-iq.org}}</ref> The AGCT was of interest to researchers because of the breadth of the test taker sample (1.75 million men took the original test).

A composite score derived from elements of the Army ASVAB is called "General Technical", usually abbreviated "GT", and if you scored 136 or higher before prior to 1980 Mensa will accept the result as proof of being in the 98th percentile.


==The Army Alpha and Beta Intelligence Tests==
==The Army Alpha and Beta Intelligence Tests==
The first intelligence tests were created during World War I to screen the thousands of soldiers being recruited by the United States military.<ref>{{cite web|title=A Brief History of the SAT|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/where/history.html|publisher=Frontline|access-date=March 10, 2014}}</ref>


[[Robert Yerkes]] and a committee of six representatives developed two intelligence tests; the [[Army Alpha]] test and the [[Army Beta]] test to help the United States military screen incoming soldiers for "intellectual deficiencies, psychopathic tendencies, nervous intangibility, and inadequate self-control".<ref name=Carson>{{cite journal|last=Carson|first=John|title=Alpha Army, Army Brass, and the Search for Army Intelligence|journal=Isis|date=June 1993|volume=84|issue=2|pages=278–309|doi=10.1086/356463|s2cid=143928356}}<!--|accessdate=March 10, 2014--></ref> The Alpha test was a verbal test for literate recruits and was divided into eight test categories, which included: following oral directions, arithmetical problems, practical judgments, synonyms and antonyms, disarranged sentences, number series completion, analogies and information,<ref>{{cite web |first=S. J. |last=Gould |title=A nation of morons|url=http://www.holah.karoo.net/gouldstudy.htm |publisher=Mark Holah |access-date=March 10, 2014}}</ref> whereas the Beta test was a nonverbal test used for testing illiterate or non-English speaking recruits. The Beta test did not require those being tested to use written language, but rather the examinees completed tasks by using visual aids.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Ernest R Hilgard|first=Ernest R|title=Robert M. Yerkes Biography|journal=National Academy of Sciences|year=1965|pages=1–43}}</ref> The Beta Intelligence test was divided into seven subtests, which included: "Test 1- assessed the ability of army recruits to trace the path of a maze; Test 2- assessed the ability of cube analysis; Test 3-assessed the ability of pattern analysis using an X-O series; Test 4- assessed the ability of coding digits with symbols; Test 5- assessed the ability of number checking; Test 6-assessed the ability of pictorial completion; and Test 7- assessed the ability of geometrical construction".
[[Intelligence testing]] plays a very important role in how [[school psychologist]] and special educators evaluate and assess children for placement in special education programs. Many Educational systems in the modern society use the [[Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children]] to assess the intellectual functioning of children. However, just because intelligence testing is a huge phenomena in the education world, the creation of intelligence testing was not intended for educational use. Rather, the first intelligence tests were created during World War I to screen the thousands of soldiers being recruited by the United States Military.<ref>{{cite web|title=A Brief History of the SAT|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/where/history.html|publisher=Frontline|accessdate=March 10, 2014}}</ref>

[[Robert Yerkes]] and a committee of six representatives developed two intelligence tests; the [[Army Alpha]] test and the [[Army Beta]] test to help the United States Military screen incoming soldiers for "intellectual deficiencies, psychopathic tendencies, nervous intangibility, and inadequate self-control".<ref name=Carson>{{cite journal|last=Carson|first=John|title=Alpha Army, Army Brass, and the Search for Army Intelligence|journal=Isis|date=June 1993|volume=84|issue=2|pages=278–309|doi=10.1086/356463}}<!--|accessdate=March 10, 2014--></ref> The Alpha test was a verbal test for literate recruits and was divided into eight test categories, which included: following oral directions, arithmetical problems, practical judgments, synonyms and antonyms, disarranged sentences, number series completion, analogies and information,<ref>{{cite web |first=S. J. |last=Gould |title=A nation of morons|url=http://www.holah.karoo.net/gouldstudy.htm |publisher=Mark Holah |accessdate=March 10, 2014}}</ref> whereas the Beta test was a nonverbal test used for testing illiterate or non-English speaking recruits. The Beta test did not require those being tested to use written language, but rather the examinees completed tasks by using visual aids.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Ernest R Hilgard|first=Ernest R|title=Robert M. Yerkes Biography|journal=National Academy of Sciences.|year=1965|pages=1–43}}</ref> The Beta Intelligence test was divided into seven subtests, which included: "Test 1- assessed the ability of army recruits to trace the path of a maze; Test 2- assessed the ability of cube analysis; Test 3-assessed the ability of pattern analysis using an X-O series; Test 4- assessed the ability of coding digits with symbols; Test 5- assessed the ability of number checking; Test 6-assessed the ability of pictorial completion; and Test 7- assessed the ability of geometrical construction".


Overall, the Army Alpha and the Army Beta tests were designed to find the mental age of military recruits and to assess incoming recruits for success in the US Military by testing one's ability to understand language, to perform reasoning with semantic and quantitative relationships, to make practical judgments, to infer rules and regulations, and to recall general information.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Pioneers in Standardized Testing|journal=Science and Technology|year=2002|volume=19|issue=9|pages=1–5}}</ref> The Army Alpha and the Army Beta tests were heavily criticized for being biased and for not predicting the actual success of incoming soldiers. Nevertheless, Robert Yerkes's innovations in standardized testing and the use of [[psychometrics]] to calculate those standardized tests are still seen in intelligence testing today.<ref name=Carson/>
Overall, the Army Alpha and the Army Beta tests were designed to find the mental age of military recruits and to assess incoming recruits for success in the US Military by testing one's ability to understand language, to perform reasoning with semantic and quantitative relationships, to make practical judgments, to infer rules and regulations, and to recall general information.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Pioneers in Standardized Testing|journal=Issues in Science and Technology|year=2002|volume=19|issue=9|pages=1–5}}</ref> The Army Alpha and the Army Beta tests have been criticized for being biased and for not predicting the actual success of incoming soldiers.<ref name=Carson/>


== See also ==
== Criticism ==


*''[[The Mismeasure of Man]]'' by [[Stephen Jay Gould]]
*''[[The Mismeasure of Man]]'' by [[Stephen Jay Gould]]
Line 28: Line 25:
==Further reading==
==Further reading==


* {{cite |last=Tuddenham |first=Read D. |title=Soldier intelligence in World Wars I and II |journal=American Psychologist |volume=3 |number=2 |pages=54–56 |date=1948 |doi=10.1037/h0054962 |pmid=18911933 |ref=harv}}
* {{citation |last=Tuddenham |first=Read D. |title=Soldier intelligence in World Wars I and II |journal=American Psychologist |volume=3 |number=2 |pages=54–56 |date=1948 |doi=10.1037/h0054962 |pmid=18911933 }}


[[Category:Educational assessment and evaluation]]
[[Category:Entrance examinations]]
[[Category:Military education and training in the United States]]
[[Category:Military education and training in the United States]]
[[Category:Intelligence tests]]

Latest revision as of 04:54, 18 June 2024

The Army General Classification Test (AGCT) has a long history that runs parallel with research and means for attempting the assessment of intelligence or other abilities.[1]

World War I and World War II created the need for this type of testing and provided a large body of test subjects. The early emphasis (World War I) was on determining the level of literacy (Alpha test) among a heterogeneous group. Illiterates were given another test (Army Beta); some enrollees were interviewed. Subsequent testing targeted aptitude in order to better fill roles, such as those provided by officers who obtained commissions from other than the United States military academies, or to meet the need for increasingly complicated skills that came along with technological progress, especially after World War II.[2]

As with other measurement attempts, the AGCT ran into controversy during the era of the Vietnam War.[clarification needed][3][4] Yet, the requirement did not abate, leading to improvements in the application and use of the standard testing methodology.

The modern variant of this test is the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) that was first administered in 1960.[5]

Many high IQ societies, such as Mensa and Intertel, can map their entrance requirements to early AGCT scores.[6][7] The AGCT was of interest to researchers because of the breadth of the test taker sample (1.75 million men took the original test).

The Army Alpha and Beta Intelligence Tests[edit]

The first intelligence tests were created during World War I to screen the thousands of soldiers being recruited by the United States military.[8]

Robert Yerkes and a committee of six representatives developed two intelligence tests; the Army Alpha test and the Army Beta test to help the United States military screen incoming soldiers for "intellectual deficiencies, psychopathic tendencies, nervous intangibility, and inadequate self-control".[9] The Alpha test was a verbal test for literate recruits and was divided into eight test categories, which included: following oral directions, arithmetical problems, practical judgments, synonyms and antonyms, disarranged sentences, number series completion, analogies and information,[10] whereas the Beta test was a nonverbal test used for testing illiterate or non-English speaking recruits. The Beta test did not require those being tested to use written language, but rather the examinees completed tasks by using visual aids.[11] The Beta Intelligence test was divided into seven subtests, which included: "Test 1- assessed the ability of army recruits to trace the path of a maze; Test 2- assessed the ability of cube analysis; Test 3-assessed the ability of pattern analysis using an X-O series; Test 4- assessed the ability of coding digits with symbols; Test 5- assessed the ability of number checking; Test 6-assessed the ability of pictorial completion; and Test 7- assessed the ability of geometrical construction".

Overall, the Army Alpha and the Army Beta tests were designed to find the mental age of military recruits and to assess incoming recruits for success in the US Military by testing one's ability to understand language, to perform reasoning with semantic and quantitative relationships, to make practical judgments, to infer rules and regulations, and to recall general information.[12] The Army Alpha and the Army Beta tests have been criticized for being biased and for not predicting the actual success of incoming soldiers.[9]

Criticism[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Paul F. Ballantyne, Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism "Chapter 4, Rise of Group Ability Testing ... (1918–1932)'
  2. ^ Paul F. Ballantyne, Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism "Chapter 5, From Training Programs to World War II Testing ... (1933–1946)"
  3. ^ Morris J. MacGregor, Jr. Integration of the Armed Forces 1940–1965. United States Army Center of Military History.
  4. ^ Paul F. Ballantyne, Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism "Chapter 7, Questioning the Ideology of Testing ... (1964–1981)"
  5. ^ USMEPCOM Your Future Begins Now, Testing Archived March 20, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ American MENSA Qualifying Test Scores Archived August 19, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  7. ^ "Intertel - Join us". www.intertel-iq.org. Retrieved 2021-03-15.
  8. ^ "A Brief History of the SAT". Frontline. Retrieved March 10, 2014.
  9. ^ a b Carson, John (June 1993). "Alpha Army, Army Brass, and the Search for Army Intelligence". Isis. 84 (2): 278–309. doi:10.1086/356463. S2CID 143928356.
  10. ^ Gould, S. J. "A nation of morons". Mark Holah. Retrieved March 10, 2014.
  11. ^ Ernest R Hilgard, Ernest R (1965). "Robert M. Yerkes Biography". National Academy of Sciences: 1–43.
  12. ^ "Pioneers in Standardized Testing". Issues in Science and Technology. 19 (9): 1–5. 2002.

Further reading[edit]