List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 205: Difference between revisions
Friothaire (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
cleanup |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2022}} |
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2022}} |
||
{{Infobox high court |
{{Infobox high court |
||
| court_name |
| court_name = {{nowrap|Supreme Court of the United States}} |
||
| image |
| image = Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg |
||
| imagesize |
| imagesize = 180 |
||
| established |
| established = {{start date and age|1789|3|4}} |
||
| location |
| location = [[Washington, D.C.]] |
||
| coordinates |
| coordinates = {{Coord|38|53|26|N|77|00|16|W|type:landmark_region:US-DC|display=inline,title}} |
||
| type |
| type = Presidential nomination with Senate [[advice and consent|confirmation]] |
||
| authority |
| authority = [[Constitution of the United States]], Art. III, §{{nbsp}}1 |
||
| terms |
| terms = life tenure, subject to [[Federal impeachment in the United States|impeachment]] and removal |
||
| positions |
| positions = 9 (by statute) |
||
| website |
| website = {{URL|supremecourt.gov}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{SCOTUS series}} |
{{SCOTUS series}} |
||
{{United States constitutional law}} |
{{United States constitutional law}} |
||
This is a '''list of |
This is a '''list of cases reported in volume 205 of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] in 1907. |
||
== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 205 U.S. == |
== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 205 U.S. == |
||
{{ |
{{See also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States}} |
||
{{ |
{{See also|List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office}} |
||
{{See also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). |
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). |
||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
⚫ | |||
! Portrait !! Justice !! Office !! Home State !! Succeeded !! Date confirmed by the Senate<br />(Vote) !! Tenure on Supreme Court |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Home State |
|||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Succeeded |
|||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Date confirmed by the Senate<br />(Vote) |
|||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Tenure on Supreme Court |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[File:Melville Weston Fuller Chief Justice 1908.jpg| |
| [[File:Melville Weston Fuller Chief Justice 1908.jpg|75px]] |
||
| [[Melville Fuller]] |
| [[Melville Fuller]] |
||
| [[Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Chief Justice]] |
| [[Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Chief Justice]] |
||
Line 41: | Line 48: | ||
| {{dts|October 8, 1888}}<br />–<br />July 4, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
| {{dts|October 8, 1888}}<br />–<br />July 4, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[File:JudgeJMHarlan.jpg| |
| [[File:JudgeJMHarlan.jpg|75px]] |
||
| [[John Marshall Harlan]] |
| [[John Marshall Harlan]] |
||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
Line 49: | Line 56: | ||
| {{dts|December 10, 1877}}<br />–<br />October 14, 1911<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
| {{dts|December 10, 1877}}<br />–<br />October 14, 1911<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[File:DavidBrewer.jpg| |
| [[File:DavidBrewer.jpg|75px]] |
||
| [[David Josiah Brewer]] |
| [[David Josiah Brewer]] |
||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
Line 57: | Line 64: | ||
| {{dts|January 6, 1890}}<br />–<br />March 28, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
| {{dts|January 6, 1890}}<br />–<br />March 28, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[File:Edward White, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing slightly left, 1905.jpg| |
| [[File:Edward White, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing slightly left, 1905.jpg|75px]] |
||
| [[Edward Douglass White]] |
| [[Edward Douglass White]] |
||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
Line 65: | Line 72: | ||
| {{dts|March 12, 1894}}<br />–<br />December 18, 1910<br /><small>(Continued as chief justice)</small> |
| {{dts|March 12, 1894}}<br />–<br />December 18, 1910<br /><small>(Continued as chief justice)</small> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[File:Rufus Wheeler Peckham cph.3b30513.jpg| |
| [[File:Rufus Wheeler Peckham cph.3b30513.jpg|75px]] |
||
| [[Rufus W. Peckham]] |
| [[Rufus W. Peckham]] |
||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
Line 73: | Line 80: | ||
| {{dts|January 6, 1896}}<br />–<br />October 24, 1909<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
| {{dts|January 6, 1896}}<br />–<br />October 24, 1909<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[File:Justice McKenna.jpg|alt=| |
|[[File:Justice McKenna.jpg|alt=|75px]] |
||
| [[Joseph McKenna]] |
| [[Joseph McKenna]] |
||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
Line 81: | Line 88: | ||
| {{dts|January 26, 1898}}<br />–<br />January 5, 1925<br /><small>(Retired)</small> |
| {{dts|January 26, 1898}}<br />–<br />January 5, 1925<br /><small>(Retired)</small> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[File:Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr circa 1930-edit.jpg| |
| [[File:Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr circa 1930-edit.jpg|75px]] |
||
| [[Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.]] |
| [[Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.]] |
||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
Line 89: | Line 96: | ||
| {{dts|December 8, 1902}}<br />–<br />January 12, 1932<br /><small>(Retired)</small> |
| {{dts|December 8, 1902}}<br />–<br />January 12, 1932<br /><small>(Retired)</small> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[File:Justice William R. Day.jpg| |
| [[File:Justice William R. Day.jpg|75px]] |
||
| [[William R. Day]] |
| [[William R. Day]] |
||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
Line 97: | Line 104: | ||
| {{dts|March 2, 1903}}<br />–<br />November 13, 1922<br /><small>(Retired)</small> |
| {{dts|March 2, 1903}}<br />–<br />November 13, 1922<br /><small>(Retired)</small> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[File:WHMoody.jpg| |
| [[File:WHMoody.jpg|75px]] |
||
| [[William Henry Moody]] |
| [[William Henry Moody]] |
||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
Line 107: | Line 114: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
==Notable Case in 205 U.S.== |
== Notable Case in 205 U.S. == |
||
===''Halter v. Nebraska''=== |
=== ''Halter v. Nebraska'' === |
||
''[[Halter v. Nebraska]]'', [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96619/halter-v-nebraska 205 U.S. 34 (1907)], was a Supreme Court decision involving a [[Nebraska]] statute that prevented and punished desecration of the [[flag of the United States]], and prohibited the sale of articles upon which there is a representation of the flag for advertising purposes. The court held that the statute was not unconstitutional either as depriving the owner of such articles of his property without due process of law, or as denying him the equal protection of the laws because of the exception from the operation of the statute of newspapers, periodicals, or books upon which the flag may be represented if disconnected from any advertisement. |
''[[Halter v. Nebraska]]'', [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96619/halter-v-nebraska 205 U.S. 34 (1907)], was a Supreme Court decision involving a [[Nebraska]] statute that prevented and punished desecration of the [[flag of the United States]], and prohibited the sale of articles upon which there is a representation of the flag for advertising purposes. The court held that the statute was not unconstitutional either as depriving the owner of such articles of his property without due process of law, or as denying him the equal protection of the laws because of the exception from the operation of the statute of newspapers, periodicals, or books upon which the flag may be represented if disconnected from any advertisement. |
||
== Citation style == |
== Citation style == |
||
{{ |
{{See also|United States district court}} |
||
{{ |
{{See also|United States circuit court}} |
||
{{ |
{{See also|United States court of appeals}} |
||
{{ |
{{See also|United States federal courts}} |
||
Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited [[original jurisdiction]] (''i.e.,'' in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region. |
Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited [[original jurisdiction]] (''i.e.,'' in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region. |
||
The [[Judiciary Act of 1891]] created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by [[writ of certiorari]]. |
The [[Judiciary Act of 1891]] created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by [[writ of certiorari]]. |
||
[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions. |
[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions. |
||
* "# Cir." = [[United States Court of Appeals]] |
* "# Cir." = [[United States Court of Appeals]] |
||
** ''e.g.,'' "3d Cir." = [[United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit]] |
** ''e.g.,'' "3d Cir." = [[United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit]] |
||
Line 126: | Line 133: | ||
** ''e.g.,''"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey |
** ''e.g.,''"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey |
||
* "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . . |
* "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . . |
||
** ''e.g.,''"D. Mass." = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]] |
** ''e.g.,''"D. Mass." = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]] |
||
* "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western |
* "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western |
||
** ''e.g.,''"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York |
** ''e.g.,''"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York |
||
** ''e.g.,''"M.D. Ala." = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]] |
** ''e.g.,''"M.D. Ala." = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]] |
||
* "Ct. Cl." = [[United States Court of Claims]] |
* "Ct. Cl." = [[United States Court of Claims]] |
||
* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time. |
* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time. |
||
** ''e.g.,''"Pa." = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]] |
** ''e.g.,''"Pa." = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]] |
||
** ''e.g.,''"Me." = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]] |
** ''e.g.,''"Me." = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]] |
||
== List of cases in volume 205 U.S. == |
== List of cases in volume 205 U.S. == |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 500px;" | Case Name |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 95px;" | Page and year |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s) |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Dissenting opinion(s) |
|||
! scope="col" style="width: 150px;" | Lower Court |
|||
! scope="col" style="width: 110px;" | Disposition |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Schlemmer v. [[Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway |
| ''Schlemmer v. [[Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway]] Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96616/schlemmer-v-buffalo-r-pr-co 1 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96616/schlemmer-v-buffalo-r-pr-co 1 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| Brewer |
||
| |
| [[Pennsylvania Supreme Court|Pa.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Tinsley v. Treat]]'' |
| ''[[Tinsley v. Treat]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96617/tinsley-v-treat 20 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96617/tinsley-v-treat 20 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Fuller |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Va.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Kessler v. Treat]]'' |
| ''[[Kessler v. Treat]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96618/kessler-v-treat 33 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96618/kessler-v-treat 33 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Fuller |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Va.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Halter v. Nebraska]]'' |
| ''[[Halter v. Nebraska]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96619/halter-v-nebraska 34 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96619/halter-v-nebraska 34 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Harlan |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Nebraska Supreme Court|Neb.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Citizens' |
| ''Citizens' Savings and Trust Company v. [[Illinois Central Railroad]] Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96620/citizenssav-tr-co-v-illinois-cent-rr |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96620/citizenssav-tr-co-v-illinois-cent-rr 46 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Harlan |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ill.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Wilmington Star Mining Co. v. Fulton]]'' |
| ''[[Wilmington Star Mining Co. v. Fulton|Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96621/wilmington-star-mining-co-v-fulton 60 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96621/wilmington-star-mining-co-v-fulton 60 (1907)] |
||
| |
| White |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.N.D. Ill.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[United States ex rel. West v. Hitchcock]]'' |
| ''[[United States ex rel. West v. Hitchcock]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96622/united-states-ex-rel-west-v-hitchcock |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96622/united-states-ex-rel-west-v-hitchcock 80 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Perovich v. United States'' |
| ''Perovich v. United States'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96623/perovich-v-united-states 86 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96623/perovich-v-united-states 86 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Brewer |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States District Court for the District of Alaska|D. Alaska]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Delamater v. [[South Dakota]]'' |
| ''Delamater v. [[South Dakota]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96624/delamater-v-south-dakota |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96624/delamater-v-south-dakota 93 (1907)] |
||
| |
| White |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[South Dakota Supreme Court|S.D.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''United States v. [[Bethlehem Steel]] |
| ''United States v. [[Bethlehem Steel]] Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96625/united-states-v-bethlehem-steel-co 105 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96625/united-states-v-bethlehem-steel-co 105 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Peckham |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Claims|Ct. Cl.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Northern Pacific Railroad |
| ''[[Northern Pacific Railroad]] Company v. Slaght I'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96626/northern-pacific-r-co-v-slaght |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96626/northern-pacific-r-co-v-slaght 122 (1907)] |
||
| |
| McKenna |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Washington Supreme Court|Wash.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Northern Pacific Railroad |
| ''[[Northern Pacific Railroad]] Company v. Slaght II'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96627/northern-pacific-r-co-v-slaght |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96627/northern-pacific-r-co-v-slaght 134 (1907)] |
||
| |
| McKenna |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Washington Supreme Court|Wash.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Martin v. [[Washington, D.C.|District of Columbia]]'' |
| ''Martin v. [[Washington, D.C.|District of Columbia]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96628/martin-v-district-of-columbia 135 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96628/martin-v-district-of-columbia 135 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Wetmore v. Karrick'' |
| ''Wetmore v. Karrick'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96629/wetmore-v-karrick |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96629/wetmore-v-karrick 141 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Day |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''United States v. Mitchell'' |
| ''United States v. Mitchell'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96630/united-states-v-mitchell 161 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96630/united-states-v-mitchell 161 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Fuller |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Claims|Ct. Cl.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Tracy v. Ginzberg'' |
| ''Tracy v. Ginzberg'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96631/tracy-v-ginzberg 170 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96631/tracy-v-ginzberg 170 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Harlan |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court|Mass.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Urquhart v. Brown'' |
| ''Urquhart v. Brown'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620727/urquhart-v-brown |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620727/urquhart-v-brown 179 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Harlan |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.W.D. Wash.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Tindle v. Birkett'' |
| ''Tindle v. Birkett'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96633/tindle-v-birkett |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96633/tindle-v-birkett 183 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Fuller |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Davidson |
| ''Davidson Steamship Company v. United States'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96634/davidson-ss-co-v-united-states |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96634/davidson-ss-co-v-united-states 187 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Brewer |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Love v. Flahive'' |
| ''Love v. Flahive'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96635/love-v-flahive |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96635/love-v-flahive 195 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Brewer |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Montana Supreme Court|Mont.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Hiscock v. Mertens'' |
| ''Hiscock v. Mertens'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96636/hiscock-v-mertens |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96636/hiscock-v-mertens 202 (1907)] |
||
| |
| McKenna |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|2d Cir.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Moore v. McGuire'' |
| ''Moore v. McGuire'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96637/moore-v-mcguire |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96637/moore-v-mcguire 214 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Empire State |
| ''Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company v. Hanley'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96638/empire-state-idaho-mining-developing-co-v-hanley |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96638/empire-state-idaho-mining-developing-co-v-hanley 225 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Day |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.D. Idaho]] |
||
| |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Rochester |
| ''Rochester Railroad Company v. [[Rochester, New York|City of Rochester]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96639/rochester-r-co-v-rochester |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96639/rochester-r-co-v-rochester 236 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Moody |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Pearcy v. Stranahan]]'' |
| ''[[Pearcy v. Stranahan]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96640/pearcy-v-stranahan |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96640/pearcy-v-stranahan 257 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Fuller |
||
| |
| White |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Swing v. Weston Lumber |
| ''Swing v. Weston Lumber Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96641/swing-v-weston-lumber-co 275 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96641/swing-v-weston-lumber-co 275 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Fuller |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Michigan Supreme Court|Mich.]] |
||
| |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Gila Bend, Arizona|Gila Bend]] |
| ''[[Gila Bend, Arizona|Gila Bend]] Reservoir and Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620726/gila-bend-reservoir-irrigation-co-v-gila-water-co |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620726/gila-bend-reservoir-irrigation-co-v-gila-water-co 279 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Brewer |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Arizona Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.]] |
||
| |
| rehearing denied |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Ballentyne v. Smith'' |
| ''Ballentyne v. Smith'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96643/ballentyne-v-smith |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96643/ballentyne-v-smith 285 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Brewer |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Fields v. United States'' |
| ''Fields v. United States'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96644/fields-v-united-states 292 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96644/fields-v-united-states 292 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Brewer |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]] |
||
| |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Mercantile |
| ''Mercantile Trust Company v. Hensey'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96645/mercantile-trust-co-v-hensey |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96645/mercantile-trust-co-v-hensey 298 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Peckham |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Johnson v. Browne'' |
| ''Johnson v. Browne'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96646/johnson-v-browne |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96646/johnson-v-browne 309 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Peckham |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Hunt v. [[New York Cotton Exchange |
| ''Hunt v. [[New York Cotton Exchange]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96647/hunt-v-new-york-cotton-exchange 322 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96647/hunt-v-new-york-cotton-exchange 322 (1907)] |
||
| |
| McKenna |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.W.D. Tenn.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '' |
| ''W.W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96648/william-w-bierce-ltd-v-hutchins 340 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96648/william-w-bierce-ltd-v-hutchins 340 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Kawananokoa v. Polyblank'' |
| ''Kawananokoa v. Polyblank'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96649/kawananakoa-v-polyblank 349 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96649/kawananakoa-v-polyblank 349 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''The Winnebago'' |
| ''The Winnebago'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96650/the-winnebago |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96650/the-winnebago 354 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Day |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Michigan Supreme Court|Mich.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Peterson v. [[Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad |
| ''Peterson v. [[Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad]] Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96651/peterson-v-chicago-ri-pr-co |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96651/peterson-v-chicago-ri-pr-co 364 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Day |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.N.D. Tex.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[MetLife|Metropolitan Life |
| ''[[MetLife|Metropolitan Life Insurance Company]] v. [[New Orleans, Louisiana|City of New Orleans]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96652/metropolitan-life-ins-co-of-ny-v-new-orleans |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96652/metropolitan-life-ins-co-of-ny-v-new-orleans 395 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Moody |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Louisiana Supreme Court|La.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Behn, Meyer |
| ''Behn, Meyer and Company v. Campbell and Go Tauco'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96653/behn-meyer-co-v-campbell-go-tauco |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96653/behn-meyer-co-v-campbell-go-tauco 403 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Moody |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| [[Supreme Court of the Philippines|Phil.]] |
| [[Supreme Court of the Philippines|Phil.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Quinlan v. [[Green County, Kentucky|Green |
| ''Quinlan v. [[Green County, Kentucky|Green County]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96654/quinlan-v-green-county 410 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96654/quinlan-v-green-county 410 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Moody |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit|6th Cir.]] |
||
| certification |
|||
| [[remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Travers v. Reinhardt'' |
| ''Travers v. Reinhardt'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96655/travers-v-reinhardt 423 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96655/travers-v-reinhardt 423 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Harlan |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad |
| ''[[Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad]] Company v. Williams'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96656/chicago-b-qr-co-v-williams 444 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96656/chicago-b-qr-co-v-williams 444 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Harlan |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]] |
||
| |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Patterson v. Colorado |
| ''[[Patterson v. Colorado]] ex rel. Attorney General'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96657/patterson-v-colorado-ex-rel-attorney-general-of-colo 454 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96657/patterson-v-colorado-ex-rel-attorney-general-of-colo 454 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| Harlan, Brewer |
||
| |
| [[Colorado Supreme Court|Colo.]] |
||
| |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Chanler v. Kelsey'' |
| ''Chanler v. Kelsey'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96658/chanler-v-kelsey 466 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96658/chanler-v-kelsey 466 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Day |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| [[New York Surrogate's Court|N.Y. Sur. Ct.]] |
| [[New York Surrogate's Court|N.Y. County Sur. Ct.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Barrington v. [[Missouri]]'' |
| ''Barrington v. [[Missouri]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96659/barrington-v-missouri |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96659/barrington-v-missouri 483 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Fuller |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Missouri Supreme Court|Mo.]] |
||
| |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Whitfield v. [[Aetna]] Life |
| ''Whitfield v. [[Aetna]] Life Insurance Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96660/whitfield-v-aetna-life-ins-co-of-hartford 489 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96660/whitfield-v-aetna-life-ins-co-of-hartford 489 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Harlan |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Harrison v. Magoon'' |
| ''Harrison v. Magoon'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96661/harrison-v-magoon |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96661/harrison-v-magoon 501 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Holmes |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]] |
||
| |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Home |
| ''Home Savings Bank v. [[Des Moines, Iowa|City of Des Moines]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96662/home-savings-bank-v-des-moines |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96662/home-savings-bank-v-des-moines 503 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Moody |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[Iowa Supreme Court|Iowa]] |
||
| |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Frank v. Vollkommer'' |
| ''Frank v. Vollkommer'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96663/frank-v-vollkommer |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96663/frank-v-vollkommer 521 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Fuller |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Green v. [[Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad |
| ''Green v. [[Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad]] Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96664/green-v-chicago-b-qr-co 530 (1907)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96664/green-v-chicago-b-qr-co 530 (1907)] |
||
| |
| Moody |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| none |
||
| |
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Pa..]] |
||
| |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
==Notes and references== |
== Notes and references == |
||
{{notelist}} |
{{notelist}} |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
==See also== |
== See also == |
||
*[[Certificate of division]] |
*[[Certificate of division]] |
||
==External links== |
== External links == |
||
* [https://www.loc.gov/search/?in=&q=us+reports+volume+205&new=true&st=] Case reports in volume 205 from Library of Congress |
* [https://www.loc.gov/search/?in=&q=us+reports+volume+205&new=true&st=] Case reports in volume 205 from Library of Congress |
||
* [https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=%22205%20U.S.%20%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled%20asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1907&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1908&court=scotus] Case reports in volume 205 from Court Listener |
* [https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=%22205%20U.S.%20%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled%20asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1907&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1908&court=scotus] Case reports in volume 205 from Court Listener |
||
Line 565: | Line 575: | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:United States Supreme Court cases by volume}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:United States Supreme Court cases by volume}} |
||
[[Category:Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume| ]] |
|||
[[Category:1907 in United States case law| ]] |
[[Category:1907 in United States case law| ]] |
Latest revision as of 08:00, 8 April 2023
Supreme Court of the United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
![]() | |
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W | |
Established | March 4, 1789 |
Location | Washington, D.C. |
Coordinates | 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W |
Composition method | Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation |
Authorized by | Constitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1 |
Judge term length | life tenure, subject to impeachment and removal |
Number of positions | 9 (by statute) |
Website | supremecourt |
This article is part of a series on the |
Supreme Court of the United States |
---|
![]() |
The Court |
Current membership |
|
Lists of justices |
|
Court functionaries |
This is a list of cases reported in volume 205 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1907.
Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 205 U.S.[edit]
The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).
When the cases in volume 205 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
Portrait | Justice | Office | Home State | Succeeded | Date confirmed by the Senate (Vote) |
Tenure on Supreme Court |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Melville Fuller | Chief Justice | Illinois | Morrison Waite | July 20, 1888 (41–20) |
October 8, 1888 – July 4, 1910 (Died) |
![]() |
John Marshall Harlan | Associate Justice | Kentucky | David Davis | November 29, 1877 (Acclamation) |
December 10, 1877 – October 14, 1911 (Died) |
![]() |
David Josiah Brewer | Associate Justice | Kansas | Stanley Matthews | December 18, 1889 (53–11) |
January 6, 1890 – March 28, 1910 (Died) |
![]() |
Edward Douglass White | Associate Justice | Louisiana | Samuel Blatchford | February 19, 1894 (Acclamation) |
March 12, 1894 – December 18, 1910 (Continued as chief justice) |
![]() |
Rufus W. Peckham | Associate Justice | New York | Howell Edmunds Jackson | December 9, 1895 (Acclamation) |
January 6, 1896 – October 24, 1909 (Died) |
![]() |
Joseph McKenna | Associate Justice | California | Stephen Johnson Field | January 21, 1898 (Acclamation) |
January 26, 1898 – January 5, 1925 (Retired) |
![]() |
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. | Associate Justice | Massachusetts | Horace Gray | December 4, 1902 (Acclamation) |
December 8, 1902 – January 12, 1932 (Retired) |
![]() |
William R. Day | Associate Justice | Ohio | George Shiras Jr. | February 23, 1903 (Acclamation) |
March 2, 1903 – November 13, 1922 (Retired) |
![]() |
William Henry Moody | Associate Justice | Massachusetts | Henry Billings Brown | December 12, 1906 (Acclamation) |
December 17, 1906 – November 20, 1910 (Retired) |
Notable Case in 205 U.S.[edit]
Halter v. Nebraska[edit]
Halter v. Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34 (1907), was a Supreme Court decision involving a Nebraska statute that prevented and punished desecration of the flag of the United States, and prohibited the sale of articles upon which there is a representation of the flag for advertising purposes. The court held that the statute was not unconstitutional either as depriving the owner of such articles of his property without due process of law, or as denying him the equal protection of the laws because of the exception from the operation of the statute of newspapers, periodicals, or books upon which the flag may be represented if disconnected from any advertisement.
Citation style[edit]
Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
- "# Cir." = United States Court of Appeals
- e.g., "3d Cir." = United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- "C.C.D." = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . .
- e.g.,"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
- "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . .
- e.g.,"D. Mass." = United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
- "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western
- e.g.,"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
- e.g.,"M.D. Ala." = United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
- "Ct. Cl." = United States Court of Claims
- The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time.
- e.g.,"Pa." = Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- e.g.,"Me." = Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
List of cases in volume 205 U.S.[edit]
Case Name | Page and year | Opinion of the Court | Concurring opinion(s) | Dissenting opinion(s) | Lower Court | Disposition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway Company | 1 (1907) | Holmes | none | Brewer | Pa. | reversed |
Tinsley v. Treat | 20 (1907) | Fuller | none | none | C.C.E.D. Va. | reversed |
Kessler v. Treat | 33 (1907) | Fuller | none | none | C.C.E.D. Va. | reversed |
Halter v. Nebraska | 34 (1907) | Harlan | none | none | Neb. | affirmed |
Citizens' Savings and Trust Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company | 46 (1907) | Harlan | none | none | C.C.E.D. Ill. | reversed |
Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton | 60 (1907) | White | none | none | C.C.N.D. Ill. | reversed |
United States ex rel. West v. Hitchcock | 80 (1907) | Holmes | none | none | D.C. Cir. | affirmed |
Perovich v. United States | 86 (1907) | Brewer | none | none | D. Alaska | affirmed |
Delamater v. South Dakota | 93 (1907) | White | none | none | S.D. | affirmed |
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company | 105 (1907) | Peckham | none | none | Ct. Cl. | reversed |
Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. Slaght I | 122 (1907) | McKenna | none | none | Wash. | affirmed |
Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. Slaght II | 134 (1907) | McKenna | none | none | Wash. | affirmed |
Martin v. District of Columbia | 135 (1907) | Holmes | none | none | D.C. Cir. | reversed |
Wetmore v. Karrick | 141 (1907) | Day | none | none | D.C. Cir. | affirmed |
United States v. Mitchell | 161 (1907) | Fuller | none | none | Ct. Cl. | reversed |
Tracy v. Ginzberg | 170 (1907) | Harlan | none | none | Mass. | affirmed |
Urquhart v. Brown | 179 (1907) | Harlan | none | none | C.C.W.D. Wash. | reversed |
Tindle v. Birkett | 183 (1907) | Fuller | none | none | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | affirmed |
Davidson Steamship Company v. United States | 187 (1907) | Brewer | none | none | 8th Cir. | affirmed |
Love v. Flahive | 195 (1907) | Brewer | none | none | Mont. | affirmed |
Hiscock v. Mertens | 202 (1907) | McKenna | none | none | 2d Cir. | affirmed |
Moore v. McGuire | 214 (1907) | Holmes | none | none | C.C.E.D. Ark. | reversed |
Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company v. Hanley | 225 (1907) | Day | none | none | C.C.D. Idaho | dismissed |
Rochester Railroad Company v. City of Rochester | 236 (1907) | Moody | none | none | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | affirmed |
Pearcy v. Stranahan | 257 (1907) | Fuller | White | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Swing v. Weston Lumber Company | 275 (1907) | Fuller | none | none | Mich. | dismissed |
Gila Bend Reservoir and Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company | 279 (1907) | Brewer | none | none | Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz. | rehearing denied |
Ballentyne v. Smith | 285 (1907) | Brewer | none | none | Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. | affirmed |
Fields v. United States | 292 (1907) | Brewer | none | none | D.C. Cir. | dismissed |
Mercantile Trust Company v. Hensey | 298 (1907) | Peckham | none | none | D.C. Cir. | affirmed |
Johnson v. Browne | 309 (1907) | Peckham | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Hunt v. New York Cotton Exchange | 322 (1907) | McKenna | none | none | C.C.W.D. Tenn. | affirmed |
W.W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins | 340 (1907) | Holmes | none | none | Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. | reversed |
Kawananokoa v. Polyblank | 349 (1907) | Holmes | none | none | Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. | affirmed |
The Winnebago | 354 (1907) | Day | none | none | Mich. | affirmed |
Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company | 364 (1907) | Day | none | none | C.C.N.D. Tex. | affirmed |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. City of New Orleans | 395 (1907) | Moody | none | none | La. | affirmed |
Behn, Meyer and Company v. Campbell and Go Tauco | 403 (1907) | Moody | none | none | Phil. | affirmed |
Quinlan v. Green County | 410 (1907) | Moody | none | none | 6th Cir. | certification |
Travers v. Reinhardt | 423 (1907) | Harlan | none | Holmes | D.C. Cir. | affirmed |
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Williams | 444 (1907) | Harlan | none | none | 8th Cir. | dismissed |
Patterson v. Colorado ex rel. Attorney General | 454 (1907) | Holmes | none | Harlan, Brewer | Colo. | dismissed |
Chanler v. Kelsey | 466 (1907) | Day | none | Holmes | N.Y. County Sur. Ct. | affirmed |
Barrington v. Missouri | 483 (1907) | Fuller | none | none | Mo. | dismissed |
Whitfield v. Aetna Life Insurance Company | 489 (1907) | Harlan | none | none | 8th Cir. | reversed |
Harrison v. Magoon | 501 (1907) | Holmes | none | none | Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. | dismissed |
Home Savings Bank v. City of Des Moines | 503 (1907) | Moody | none | none | Iowa | reversed |
Frank v. Vollkommer | 521 (1907) | Fuller | none | none | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | affirmed |
Green v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company | 530 (1907) | Moody | none | none | C.C.E.D. Pa.. | affirmed |
Notes and references[edit]
- ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
See also[edit]
External links[edit]
- [1] Case reports in volume 205 from Library of Congress
- [2] Case reports in volume 205 from Court Listener
- [3] Case reports in volume 205 from the Caselaw Access Project of Harvard Law School
- [4] Case reports in volume 205 from Google Scholar
- [5] Case reports in volume 205 from Justia
- [6] Case reports in volume 205 from Open Jurist
- Website of the United States Supreme Court
- United States Courts website about the Supreme Court
- National Archives, Records of the Supreme Court of the United States
- American Bar Association, How Does the Supreme Court Work?
- The Supreme Court Historical Society