Jump to content

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 205: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
cleanup
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2022}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2022}}
{{Infobox high court
{{Infobox high court
| court_name = {{nowrap|Supreme Court of the United States}}
| court_name = {{nowrap|Supreme Court of the United States}}
| image = Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
| image = Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
| imagesize = 180
| imagesize = 180
| established = {{start date and age|1789|3|4}}
| established = {{start date and age|1789|3|4}}
| location = [[Washington, D.C.]]
| location = [[Washington, D.C.]]
| coordinates = {{Coord|38|53|26|N|77|00|16|W|type:landmark_region:US-DC|display=inline,title}}
| coordinates = {{Coord|38|53|26|N|77|00|16|W|type:landmark_region:US-DC|display=inline,title}}
| type = Presidential nomination with Senate [[advice and consent|confirmation]]
| type = Presidential nomination with Senate [[advice and consent|confirmation]]
| authority = [[Constitution of the United States]], Art. III, §{{nbsp}}1
| authority = [[Constitution of the United States]], Art. III, §{{nbsp}}1
| terms = life tenure, subject to [[Impeachment in the United States|impeachment]] and removal
| terms = life tenure, subject to [[Federal impeachment in the United States|impeachment]] and removal
| positions = 9 (by statute)
| positions = 9 (by statute)
| website = {{URL|supremecourt.gov}}
| website = {{URL|supremecourt.gov}}
}}
}}
{{SCOTUS series}}
{{SCOTUS series}}


{{United States constitutional law}}
{{United States constitutional law}}
This is a '''list of the 49 cases reported in volume 205 of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] in 1907.
This is a '''list of cases reported in volume 205 of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] in 1907.


== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 205 U.S. ==
== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 205 U.S. ==
{{see also|List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office}}
{{See also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States}}
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}
{{See also|List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office}}
{{See also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}
{{see also|Fuller Court}}

The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice).
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice).


Line 31: Line 32:
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Portrait
! Portrait !! Justice !! Office !! Home State !! Succeeded !! Date confirmed by the Senate<br />(Vote) !! Tenure on Supreme Court
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Justice
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Office
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Home State
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Succeeded
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Date confirmed by the Senate<br />(Vote)
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Tenure on Supreme Court
|-
|-
| [[File:Melville Weston Fuller Chief Justice 1908.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Melville Weston Fuller Chief Justice 1908.jpg|75px]]
| [[Melville Fuller]]
| [[Melville Fuller]]
| [[Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Chief Justice]]
| [[Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Chief Justice]]
Line 41: Line 48:
| {{dts|October 8, 1888}}<br />–<br />July 4, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|October 8, 1888}}<br />–<br />July 4, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:JudgeJMHarlan.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:JudgeJMHarlan.jpg|75px]]
| [[John Marshall Harlan]]
| [[John Marshall Harlan]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 49: Line 56:
| {{dts|December 10, 1877}}<br />–<br />October 14, 1911<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|December 10, 1877}}<br />–<br />October 14, 1911<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:DavidBrewer.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:DavidBrewer.jpg|75px]]
| [[David Josiah Brewer]]
| [[David Josiah Brewer]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 57: Line 64:
| {{dts|January 6, 1890}}<br />–<br />March 28, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|January 6, 1890}}<br />–<br />March 28, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Edward White, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing slightly left, 1905.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Edward White, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing slightly left, 1905.jpg|75px]]
| [[Edward Douglass White]]
| [[Edward Douglass White]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 65: Line 72:
| {{dts|March 12, 1894}}<br />–<br />December 18, 1910<br /><small>(Continued as chief justice)</small>
| {{dts|March 12, 1894}}<br />–<br />December 18, 1910<br /><small>(Continued as chief justice)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Rufus Wheeler Peckham cph.3b30513.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Rufus Wheeler Peckham cph.3b30513.jpg|75px]]
| [[Rufus W. Peckham]]
| [[Rufus W. Peckham]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 73: Line 80:
| {{dts|January 6, 1896}}<br />–<br />October 24, 1909<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|January 6, 1896}}<br />–<br />October 24, 1909<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
|[[File:Justice McKenna.jpg|alt=|147x147px]]
|[[File:Justice McKenna.jpg|alt=|75px]]
| [[Joseph McKenna]]
| [[Joseph McKenna]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 81: Line 88:
| {{dts|January 26, 1898}}<br />–<br />January 5, 1925<br /><small>(Retired)</small>
| {{dts|January 26, 1898}}<br />–<br />January 5, 1925<br /><small>(Retired)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr circa 1930-edit.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr circa 1930-edit.jpg|75px]]
| [[Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.]]
| [[Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 89: Line 96:
| {{dts|December 8, 1902}}<br />–<br />January 12, 1932<br /><small>(Retired)</small>
| {{dts|December 8, 1902}}<br />–<br />January 12, 1932<br /><small>(Retired)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Justice William R. Day.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Justice William R. Day.jpg|75px]]
| [[William R. Day]]
| [[William R. Day]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 97: Line 104:
| {{dts|March 2, 1903}}<br />–<br />November 13, 1922<br /><small>(Retired)</small>
| {{dts|March 2, 1903}}<br />–<br />November 13, 1922<br /><small>(Retired)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:WHMoody.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:WHMoody.jpg|75px]]
| [[William Henry Moody]]
| [[William Henry Moody]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 107: Line 114:
|}
|}


==Notable Case in 205 U.S.==
== Notable Case in 205 U.S. ==
===''Halter v. Nebraska''===
=== ''Halter v. Nebraska'' ===
''[[Halter v. Nebraska]]'', [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96619/halter-v-nebraska 205 U.S. 34 (1907)], was a Supreme Court decision involving a [[Nebraska]] statute that prevented and punished desecration of the [[flag of the United States]], and prohibited the sale of articles upon which there is a representation of the flag for advertising purposes. The court held that the statute was not unconstitutional either as depriving the owner of such articles of his property without due process of law, or as denying him the equal protection of the laws because of the exception from the operation of the statute of newspapers, periodicals, or books upon which the flag may be represented if disconnected from any advertisement.
''[[Halter v. Nebraska]]'', [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96619/halter-v-nebraska 205 U.S. 34 (1907)], was a Supreme Court decision involving a [[Nebraska]] statute that prevented and punished desecration of the [[flag of the United States]], and prohibited the sale of articles upon which there is a representation of the flag for advertising purposes. The court held that the statute was not unconstitutional either as depriving the owner of such articles of his property without due process of law, or as denying him the equal protection of the laws because of the exception from the operation of the statute of newspapers, periodicals, or books upon which the flag may be represented if disconnected from any advertisement.


== Citation style ==
== Citation style ==
{{see also|United States district court}}
{{See also|United States district court}}
{{see also|United States circuit court}}
{{See also|United States circuit court}}
{{see also|United States court of appeals}}
{{See also|United States court of appeals}}
{{see also|United States federal courts}}
{{See also|United States federal courts}}
Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited [[original jurisdiction]] (''i.e.,'' in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited [[original jurisdiction]] (''i.e.,'' in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.


The [[Judiciary Act of 1891]] created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by [[writ of certiorari]].
The [[Judiciary Act of 1891]] created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by [[writ of certiorari]].


[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
* "# Cir." = [[United States Court of Appeals]]
* "# Cir." = [[United States Court of Appeals]]
** ''e.g.,'' "3d Cir." = [[United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit]]
** ''e.g.,'' "3d Cir." = [[United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit]]
Line 126: Line 133:
** ''e.g.,''"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
** ''e.g.,''"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
* "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . .
* "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . .
** ''e.g.,''"D. Mass." = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]
** ''e.g.,''"D. Mass." = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]
* "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western
* "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western
** ''e.g.,''"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
** ''e.g.,''"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
** ''e.g.,''"M.D. Ala." = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]]
** ''e.g.,''"M.D. Ala." = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]]
* "Ct. Cl." = [[United States Court of Claims]]
* "Ct. Cl." = [[United States Court of Claims]]
* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time.
* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time.
** ''e.g.,''"Pa." = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]]
** ''e.g.,''"Pa." = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]]
** ''e.g.,''"Me." = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]]
** ''e.g.,''"Me." = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]]


== List of cases in volume 205 U.S. ==
== List of cases in volume 205 U.S. ==

{| class="wikitable sortable"
{{See also|Fuller Court}}
|-

! scope="col" style="width: 416px;" | Case Name
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! scope="col" style="width: 80px;" | Page & year
|-
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s)
! scope="col" style="width: 500px;" | Case Name
! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)
! scope="col" style="width: 95px;" | Page and year
! scope="col" style="width: 133px;" | Lower Court
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court
! scope="col" style="width: 233px;" | Disposition of case
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s)
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)
! scope="col" style="width: 150px;" | Lower Court
! scope="col" style="width: 110px;" | Disposition
|-
|-
| ''Schlemmer v. [[Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway|Buffalo, R. & P.R.R. Co.]]''
| ''Schlemmer v. [[Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway]] Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96616/schlemmer-v-buffalo-r-pr-co 1 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96616/schlemmer-v-buffalo-r-pr-co 1 (1907)]
| Holmes
| Holmes
| none
| none
| Brewer
| Brewer
| [[Pennsylvania Supreme Court|Pa.]]
| [[Pennsylvania Supreme Court|Pa.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[Tinsley v. Treat]]''
| ''[[Tinsley v. Treat]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96617/tinsley-v-treat 20 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96617/tinsley-v-treat 20 (1907)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Va.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Va.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[Kessler v. Treat]]''
| ''[[Kessler v. Treat]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96618/kessler-v-treat 33 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96618/kessler-v-treat 33 (1907)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Va.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Va.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[Halter v. Nebraska]]''
| ''[[Halter v. Nebraska]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96619/halter-v-nebraska 34 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96619/halter-v-nebraska 34 (1907)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Nebraska Supreme Court|Neb.]]
| [[Nebraska Supreme Court|Neb.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Citizens' Sav. & Tr. Co. v. [[Illinois Central Railroad|Illinois Cent. R.R. Co.]]''
| ''Citizens' Savings and Trust Company v. [[Illinois Central Railroad]] Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96620/citizenssav-tr-co-v-illinois-cent-rr 46 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96620/citizenssav-tr-co-v-illinois-cent-rr 46 (1907)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ill.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ill.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[Wilmington Star Mining Co. v. Fulton]]''
| ''[[Wilmington Star Mining Co. v. Fulton|Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96621/wilmington-star-mining-co-v-fulton 60 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96621/wilmington-star-mining-co-v-fulton 60 (1907)]
| White
| White
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.N.D. Ill.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.N.D. Ill.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[United States ex rel. West v. Hitchcock]]''
| ''[[United States ex rel. West v. Hitchcock]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96622/united-states-ex-rel-west-v-hitchcock 80 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96622/united-states-ex-rel-west-v-hitchcock 80 (1907)]
| Holmes
| Holmes
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Perovich v. United States''
| ''Perovich v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96623/perovich-v-united-states 86 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96623/perovich-v-united-states 86 (1907)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States District Court for the District of Alaska|D. Alaska]]
| [[United States District Court for the District of Alaska|D. Alaska]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Delamater v. [[South Dakota]]''
| ''Delamater v. [[South Dakota]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96624/delamater-v-south-dakota 93 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96624/delamater-v-south-dakota 93 (1907)]
| White
| White
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[South Dakota Supreme Court|S.D.]]
| [[South Dakota Supreme Court|S.D.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''United States v. [[Bethlehem Steel]] Co.''
| ''United States v. [[Bethlehem Steel]] Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96625/united-states-v-bethlehem-steel-co 105 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96625/united-states-v-bethlehem-steel-co 105 (1907)]
| Peckham
| Peckham
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Claims|Ct. Cl.]]
| [[United States Court of Claims|Ct. Cl.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[Northern Pacific Railroad|Northern P.R.R. Co.]] v. Slaght I''
| ''[[Northern Pacific Railroad]] Company v. Slaght I''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96626/northern-pacific-r-co-v-slaght 122 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96626/northern-pacific-r-co-v-slaght 122 (1907)]
| McKenna
| McKenna
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Washington Supreme Court|Wash.]]
| [[Washington Supreme Court|Wash.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''[[Northern Pacific Railroad|Northern P.R.R. Co.]] v. Slaght II''
| ''[[Northern Pacific Railroad]] Company v. Slaght II''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96627/northern-pacific-r-co-v-slaght 134 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96627/northern-pacific-r-co-v-slaght 134 (1907)]
| McKenna
| McKenna
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Washington Supreme Court|Wash.]]
| [[Washington Supreme Court|Wash.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Martin v. [[Washington, D.C.|District of Columbia]]''
| ''Martin v. [[Washington, D.C.|District of Columbia]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96628/martin-v-district-of-columbia 135 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96628/martin-v-district-of-columbia 135 (1907)]
| Holmes
| Holmes
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Wetmore v. Karrick''
| ''Wetmore v. Karrick''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96629/wetmore-v-karrick 141 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96629/wetmore-v-karrick 141 (1907)]
| Day
| Day
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''United States v. Mitchell''
| ''United States v. Mitchell''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96630/united-states-v-mitchell 161 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96630/united-states-v-mitchell 161 (1907)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Claims|Ct. Cl.]]
| [[United States Court of Claims|Ct. Cl.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Tracy v. Ginzberg''
| ''Tracy v. Ginzberg''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96631/tracy-v-ginzberg 170 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96631/tracy-v-ginzberg 170 (1907)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court|Mass.]]
| [[Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court|Mass.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Urquhart v. Brown''
| ''Urquhart v. Brown''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620727/urquhart-v-brown 179 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620727/urquhart-v-brown 179 (1907)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.W.D. Wash.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.W.D. Wash.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Tindle v. Birkett''
| ''Tindle v. Birkett''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96633/tindle-v-birkett 183 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96633/tindle-v-birkett 183 (1907)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]]
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Davidson S.S. Co. v. United States''
| ''Davidson Steamship Company v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96634/davidson-ss-co-v-united-states 187 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96634/davidson-ss-co-v-united-states 187 (1907)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Love v. Flahive''
| ''Love v. Flahive''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96635/love-v-flahive 195 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96635/love-v-flahive 195 (1907)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Montana Supreme Court|Mont.]]
| [[Montana Supreme Court|Mont.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Hiscock v. Mertens''
| ''Hiscock v. Mertens''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96636/hiscock-v-mertens 202 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96636/hiscock-v-mertens 202 (1907)]
| McKenna
| McKenna
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|2d Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|2d Cir.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Moore v. McGuire''
| ''Moore v. McGuire''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96637/moore-v-mcguire 214 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96637/moore-v-mcguire 214 (1907)]
| Holmes
| Holmes
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Empire State I.M. & D. Co. v. Hanley''
| ''Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company v. Hanley''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96638/empire-state-idaho-mining-developing-co-v-hanley 225 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96638/empire-state-idaho-mining-developing-co-v-hanley 225 (1907)]
| Day
| Day
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.D. Idaho]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.D. Idaho]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Rochester R.R. Co. v. [[Rochester, New York|City of Rochester]]''
| ''Rochester Railroad Company v. [[Rochester, New York|City of Rochester]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96639/rochester-r-co-v-rochester 236 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96639/rochester-r-co-v-rochester 236 (1907)]
| Moody
| Moody
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]]
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''[[Pearcy v. Stranahan]]''
| ''[[Pearcy v. Stranahan]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96640/pearcy-v-stranahan 257 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96640/pearcy-v-stranahan 257 (1907)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| White
| White
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Swing v. Weston Lumber Co.''
| ''Swing v. Weston Lumber Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96641/swing-v-weston-lumber-co 275 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96641/swing-v-weston-lumber-co 275 (1907)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Michigan Supreme Court|Mich.]]
| [[Michigan Supreme Court|Mich.]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''[[Gila Bend, Arizona|Gila Bend]] R. & I. Co. v. Gila Water Co.''
| ''[[Gila Bend, Arizona|Gila Bend]] Reservoir and Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620726/gila-bend-reservoir-irrigation-co-v-gila-water-co 279 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620726/gila-bend-reservoir-irrigation-co-v-gila-water-co 279 (1907)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Arizona Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.]]
| [[Arizona Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.]]
| rehearing denied
| rehearing denied
|-
|-
| ''Ballentyne v. Smith''
| ''Ballentyne v. Smith''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96643/ballentyne-v-smith 285 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96643/ballentyne-v-smith 285 (1907)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]]
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Fields v. United States''
| ''Fields v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96644/fields-v-united-states 292 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96644/fields-v-united-states 292 (1907)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Mercantile Tr. Co. v. Hensey''
| ''Mercantile Trust Company v. Hensey''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96645/mercantile-trust-co-v-hensey 298 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96645/mercantile-trust-co-v-hensey 298 (1907)]
| Peckham
| Peckham
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Johnson v. Browne''
| ''Johnson v. Browne''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96646/johnson-v-browne 309 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96646/johnson-v-browne 309 (1907)]
| Peckham
| Peckham
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Hunt v. [[New York Cotton Exchange|New York Cotton Exch.]]''
| ''Hunt v. [[New York Cotton Exchange]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96647/hunt-v-new-york-cotton-exchange 322 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96647/hunt-v-new-york-cotton-exchange 322 (1907)]
| McKenna
| McKenna
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.W.D. Tenn.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.W.D. Tenn.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins''
| ''W.W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96648/william-w-bierce-ltd-v-hutchins 340 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96648/william-w-bierce-ltd-v-hutchins 340 (1907)]
| Holmes
| Holmes
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]]
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Kawananokoa v. Polyblank''
| ''Kawananokoa v. Polyblank''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96649/kawananakoa-v-polyblank 349 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96649/kawananakoa-v-polyblank 349 (1907)]
| Holmes
| Holmes
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]]
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''The Winnebago''
| ''The Winnebago''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96650/the-winnebago 354 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96650/the-winnebago 354 (1907)]
| Day
| Day
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Michigan Supreme Court|Mich.]]
| [[Michigan Supreme Court|Mich.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Peterson v. [[Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad|Chicago, R.I. & P.R.R. Co.]]''
| ''Peterson v. [[Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad]] Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96651/peterson-v-chicago-ri-pr-co 364 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96651/peterson-v-chicago-ri-pr-co 364 (1907)]
| Day
| Day
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.N.D. Tex.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.N.D. Tex.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''[[MetLife|Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.]] v. [[New Orleans, Louisiana|City of New Orleans]]''
| ''[[MetLife|Metropolitan Life Insurance Company]] v. [[New Orleans, Louisiana|City of New Orleans]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96652/metropolitan-life-ins-co-of-ny-v-new-orleans 395 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96652/metropolitan-life-ins-co-of-ny-v-new-orleans 395 (1907)]
| Moody
| Moody
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Louisiana Supreme Court|La.]]
| [[Louisiana Supreme Court|La.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Behn, Meyer & Co. v. Campbell & Go Tauco''
| ''Behn, Meyer and Company v. Campbell and Go Tauco''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96653/behn-meyer-co-v-campbell-go-tauco 403 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96653/behn-meyer-co-v-campbell-go-tauco 403 (1907)]
| Moody
| Moody
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Supreme Court of the Philippines|Phil.]]
| [[Supreme Court of the Philippines|Phil.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Quinlan v. [[Green County, Kentucky|Green Cnty.]]''
| ''Quinlan v. [[Green County, Kentucky|Green County]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96654/quinlan-v-green-county 410 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96654/quinlan-v-green-county 410 (1907)]
| Moody
| Moody
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit|6th Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit|6th Cir.]]
| certification
| [[remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]
|-
|-
| ''Travers v. Reinhardt''
| ''Travers v. Reinhardt''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96655/travers-v-reinhardt 423 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96655/travers-v-reinhardt 423 (1907)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
| Holmes
| Holmes
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia|D.C. Cir.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''[[Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad|Chicago, B. & Q.R.R. Co.]] v. Williams''
| ''[[Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad]] Company v. Williams''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96656/chicago-b-qr-co-v-williams 444 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96656/chicago-b-qr-co-v-williams 444 (1907)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''[[Patterson v. Colorado|Patterson v. Colorado ex rel. Att'y Gen.]]''
| ''[[Patterson v. Colorado]] ex rel. Attorney General''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96657/patterson-v-colorado-ex-rel-attorney-general-of-colo 454 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96657/patterson-v-colorado-ex-rel-attorney-general-of-colo 454 (1907)]
| Holmes
| Holmes
| none
| none
| Harlan, Brewer
| Harlan, Brewer
| [[Colorado Supreme Court|Colo.]]
| [[Colorado Supreme Court|Colo.]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Chanler v. Kelsey''
| ''Chanler v. Kelsey''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96658/chanler-v-kelsey 466 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96658/chanler-v-kelsey 466 (1907)]
| Day
| Day
| none
| none
| Holmes
| Holmes
| [[New York Surrogate's Court|N.Y. Sur. Ct.]]
| [[New York Surrogate's Court|N.Y. County Sur. Ct.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Barrington v. [[Missouri]]''
| ''Barrington v. [[Missouri]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96659/barrington-v-missouri 483 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96659/barrington-v-missouri 483 (1907)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Missouri Supreme Court|Mo.]]
| [[Missouri Supreme Court|Mo.]]
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Whitfield v. [[Aetna]] Life Ins. Co.''
| ''Whitfield v. [[Aetna]] Life Insurance Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96660/whitfield-v-aetna-life-ins-co-of-hartford 489 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96660/whitfield-v-aetna-life-ins-co-of-hartford 489 (1907)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit|8th Cir.]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Harrison v. Magoon''
| ''Harrison v. Magoon''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96661/harrison-v-magoon 501 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96661/harrison-v-magoon 501 (1907)]
| Holmes
| Holmes
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]]
| [[Hawaii Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw.]]
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Home Sav. Bank v. [[Des Moines, Iowa|City of Des Moines]]''
| ''Home Savings Bank v. [[Des Moines, Iowa|City of Des Moines]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96662/home-savings-bank-v-des-moines 503 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96662/home-savings-bank-v-des-moines 503 (1907)]
| Moody
| Moody
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Iowa Supreme Court|Iowa]]
| [[Iowa Supreme Court|Iowa]]
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Frank v. Vollkommer''
| ''Frank v. Vollkommer''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96663/frank-v-vollkommer 521 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96663/frank-v-vollkommer 521 (1907)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]]
| [[New York Supreme Court|N.Y. Sup. Ct.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Green v. [[Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad|Chicago, B. & Q.R.R. Co.]]''
| ''Green v. [[Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad]] Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96664/green-v-chicago-b-qr-co 530 (1907)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/96664/green-v-chicago-b-qr-co 530 (1907)]
| Moody
| Moody
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Pa..]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Pa..]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
|}
|}


==Notes and references==
== Notes and references ==
{{notelist}}
{{notelist}}
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


==See also==
== See also ==
*[[Certificate of division]]
*[[Certificate of division]]


==External links==
== External links ==
* [https://www.loc.gov/search/?in=&q=us+reports+volume+205&new=true&st=] Case reports in volume 205 from Library of Congress
* [https://www.loc.gov/search/?in=&q=us+reports+volume+205&new=true&st=] Case reports in volume 205 from Library of Congress
* [https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=%22205%20U.S.%20%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled%20asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1907&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1908&court=scotus] Case reports in volume 205 from Court Listener
* [https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=%22205%20U.S.%20%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled%20asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1907&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1908&court=scotus] Case reports in volume 205 from Court Listener
Line 565: Line 575:


{{DEFAULTSORT:United States Supreme Court cases by volume}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:United States Supreme Court cases by volume}}
[[Category:Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume| ]]
[[Category:1907 in United States case law| ]]
[[Category:1907 in United States case law| ]]

Latest revision as of 08:00, 8 April 2023

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov

This is a list of cases reported in volume 205 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1907.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 205 U.S.[edit]

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 205 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville Fuller Chief Justice Illinois Morrison Waite July 20, 1888
(41–20)
October 8, 1888

July 4, 1910
(Died)
John Marshall Harlan Associate Justice Kentucky David Davis November 29, 1877
(Acclamation)
December 10, 1877

October 14, 1911
(Died)
David Josiah Brewer Associate Justice Kansas Stanley Matthews December 18, 1889
(53–11)
January 6, 1890

March 28, 1910
(Died)
Edward Douglass White Associate Justice Louisiana Samuel Blatchford February 19, 1894
(Acclamation)
March 12, 1894

December 18, 1910
(Continued as chief justice)
Rufus W. Peckham Associate Justice New York Howell Edmunds Jackson December 9, 1895
(Acclamation)
January 6, 1896

October 24, 1909
(Died)
Joseph McKenna Associate Justice California Stephen Johnson Field January 21, 1898
(Acclamation)
January 26, 1898

January 5, 1925
(Retired)
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Associate Justice Massachusetts Horace Gray December 4, 1902
(Acclamation)
December 8, 1902

January 12, 1932
(Retired)
William R. Day Associate Justice Ohio George Shiras Jr. February 23, 1903
(Acclamation)
March 2, 1903

November 13, 1922
(Retired)
William Henry Moody Associate Justice Massachusetts Henry Billings Brown December 12, 1906
(Acclamation)
December 17, 1906

November 20, 1910
(Retired)

Notable Case in 205 U.S.[edit]

Halter v. Nebraska[edit]

Halter v. Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34 (1907), was a Supreme Court decision involving a Nebraska statute that prevented and punished desecration of the flag of the United States, and prohibited the sale of articles upon which there is a representation of the flag for advertising purposes. The court held that the statute was not unconstitutional either as depriving the owner of such articles of his property without due process of law, or as denying him the equal protection of the laws because of the exception from the operation of the statute of newspapers, periodicals, or books upon which the flag may be represented if disconnected from any advertisement.

Citation style[edit]

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 205 U.S.[edit]

Case Name Page and year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion(s) Dissenting opinion(s) Lower Court Disposition
Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway Company 1 (1907) Holmes none Brewer Pa. reversed
Tinsley v. Treat 20 (1907) Fuller none none C.C.E.D. Va. reversed
Kessler v. Treat 33 (1907) Fuller none none C.C.E.D. Va. reversed
Halter v. Nebraska 34 (1907) Harlan none none Neb. affirmed
Citizens' Savings and Trust Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company 46 (1907) Harlan none none C.C.E.D. Ill. reversed
Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton 60 (1907) White none none C.C.N.D. Ill. reversed
United States ex rel. West v. Hitchcock 80 (1907) Holmes none none D.C. Cir. affirmed
Perovich v. United States 86 (1907) Brewer none none D. Alaska affirmed
Delamater v. South Dakota 93 (1907) White none none S.D. affirmed
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company 105 (1907) Peckham none none Ct. Cl. reversed
Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. Slaght I 122 (1907) McKenna none none Wash. affirmed
Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. Slaght II 134 (1907) McKenna none none Wash. affirmed
Martin v. District of Columbia 135 (1907) Holmes none none D.C. Cir. reversed
Wetmore v. Karrick 141 (1907) Day none none D.C. Cir. affirmed
United States v. Mitchell 161 (1907) Fuller none none Ct. Cl. reversed
Tracy v. Ginzberg 170 (1907) Harlan none none Mass. affirmed
Urquhart v. Brown 179 (1907) Harlan none none C.C.W.D. Wash. reversed
Tindle v. Birkett 183 (1907) Fuller none none N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed
Davidson Steamship Company v. United States 187 (1907) Brewer none none 8th Cir. affirmed
Love v. Flahive 195 (1907) Brewer none none Mont. affirmed
Hiscock v. Mertens 202 (1907) McKenna none none 2d Cir. affirmed
Moore v. McGuire 214 (1907) Holmes none none C.C.E.D. Ark. reversed
Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company v. Hanley 225 (1907) Day none none C.C.D. Idaho dismissed
Rochester Railroad Company v. City of Rochester 236 (1907) Moody none none N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed
Pearcy v. Stranahan 257 (1907) Fuller White none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Swing v. Weston Lumber Company 275 (1907) Fuller none none Mich. dismissed
Gila Bend Reservoir and Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company 279 (1907) Brewer none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz. rehearing denied
Ballentyne v. Smith 285 (1907) Brewer none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. affirmed
Fields v. United States 292 (1907) Brewer none none D.C. Cir. dismissed
Mercantile Trust Company v. Hensey 298 (1907) Peckham none none D.C. Cir. affirmed
Johnson v. Browne 309 (1907) Peckham none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Hunt v. New York Cotton Exchange 322 (1907) McKenna none none C.C.W.D. Tenn. affirmed
W.W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins 340 (1907) Holmes none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. reversed
Kawananokoa v. Polyblank 349 (1907) Holmes none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. affirmed
The Winnebago 354 (1907) Day none none Mich. affirmed
Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company 364 (1907) Day none none C.C.N.D. Tex. affirmed
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. City of New Orleans 395 (1907) Moody none none La. affirmed
Behn, Meyer and Company v. Campbell and Go Tauco 403 (1907) Moody none none Phil. affirmed
Quinlan v. Green County 410 (1907) Moody none none 6th Cir. certification
Travers v. Reinhardt 423 (1907) Harlan none Holmes D.C. Cir. affirmed
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Williams 444 (1907) Harlan none none 8th Cir. dismissed
Patterson v. Colorado ex rel. Attorney General 454 (1907) Holmes none Harlan, Brewer Colo. dismissed
Chanler v. Kelsey 466 (1907) Day none Holmes N.Y. County Sur. Ct. affirmed
Barrington v. Missouri 483 (1907) Fuller none none Mo. dismissed
Whitfield v. Aetna Life Insurance Company 489 (1907) Harlan none none 8th Cir. reversed
Harrison v. Magoon 501 (1907) Holmes none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. dismissed
Home Savings Bank v. City of Des Moines 503 (1907) Moody none none Iowa reversed
Frank v. Vollkommer 521 (1907) Fuller none none N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed
Green v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company 530 (1907) Moody none none C.C.E.D. Pa.. affirmed

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.

See also[edit]

External links[edit]