Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Airways: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:22, 24 May 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Social Airways[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP - no coverage in major press sources etc. Article is currently referenced mainly to blogs, interview with founder, routine funding announcement, etc. Brianhe (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 17:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 02:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 03:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a good reason why we need to avoid having startups on WP. It's abuse of WP:ENN for misuse per WP:NOTPROMO. MSJapan (talk) 02:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly puffery. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above - David Gerard (talk) 13:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as sources and information are both in and of themselves PR, advertising what there is to know, and that's a notorious method of interesting clients and investors, that's why PR churnalism exists, to have companies advertise themselves, since that's the base of why such PR happens, and to let the news media save their money by not having to sacrifice costs. SwisterTwister talk 18:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because WP:TOOSOON. There is one significant mention of the company in an independent reliable source:

Social Airways: social platform makes your flights more interesting from Euronews

If anyone finds more significant coverage like that, I'd probably change my vote. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 18:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A particular focus of banned sock-farmer Euclidthalis - David Gerard (talk) 12:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of coverage in RS and pure WP:PROMO. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''.  <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 02:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 ===[[Social Airways]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|Social Airways}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Airways|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 28#{{anchorencode:Social Airways}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Social_Airways Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 7: / Line 14: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Brianhe|Brianhe]] ([[User talk:Brianhe|talk]]) 17:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Brianhe|Brianhe]] ([[User talk:Brianhe|talk]]) 02:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)</small>
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Brianhe|Brianhe]] ([[User talk:Brianhe|talk]]) 03:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' - a good reason why we need to avoid having startups on WP.  It's abuse of [[WP:ENN]] for misuse per [[WP:NOTPROMO]]. [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] ([[User talk:MSJapan|talk]]) 02:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
-<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 00:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Social Airways]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
+<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 00:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
+*'''Delete''' per [[WP:PROMO]]; strictly puffery. No indications of notability or significance. [[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 03:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per all above - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 13:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as sources and information are both in and of themselves PR, advertising what there is to know, and that's a notorious method of interesting clients and investors, that's why PR [[churnalism]] exists, to have companies advertise themselves, since that's the base of why such PR happens, and to let the news media save their money by not having to sacrifice costs. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 18:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' because [[WP:TOOSOON]].  There is one significant mention of the company in an independent reliable source:
+:* [http://www.euronews.com/2014/05/29/social-airways-social-platform-makes-your-flights-more-interesting Social Airways: social platform makes your flights more interesting] from [[Euronews]]
+:If anyone finds more significant coverage like that, I'd probably change my vote.  -- [[User:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR|<span style="background-color:#FFFF99;">'''1Wiki8'''</span>...........................]] ([[User_talk:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR|talk]]) 18:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' A particular focus of banned sock-farmer [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Euclidthalis/Archive|Euclidthalis]] - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 12:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Lack of coverage in RS and pure [[WP:PROMO]]. --[[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942|talk]]) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>